Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
This is referring to his upendra/vAmanAvatAra (as the veda-s do multiple times), yet the focus of the veda-s is praise, not on lIlA-s (which is what the purANam-s are meant for), so it obviously would not be so detailed in that regard. In addition, praise does not always imply worship; regardless, indra is clearly dependent upon viShNu in the phrase "yadÁ te víShNur ójasA trÍNi padÁ vichakramé Ádítte haryatÁ hárI vavakShatuH," whereas there is no scenario where viShNu is dependent upon indra.
Unfortunately, I have yet to come across any theological mentioning in the Rg-Veda and the Aitareya Brahmana expressing that Vishnu has avatars-s. Therefore, the Rg-Veda does not refer to Vishnu and his "vAmanAvatara", especially in that verse. KT once made a valid argument that since Vishnu is the "Father that comes down", the Rica expressing such may surely refer to Vishnu's ["later"] avatars-s, but I have yet to find any Shrautic pramANa-s that support KT's argument.
From the verse in question, no one is talking about worship; but, it is evident that Vishnu is clearly praising/lauding Indra. There is no sugarcoating this; definitely no need to get into Vaishnava-apologetics [especially not in this thread - so please try not to hijack this one]. Furthermore, there is no occurrence in the Rg-Veda that Indra has ever praised Vishnu, or any other Shri Deva for that matter. But, numerous other Deva-s, including Vishnu, have praised the "Mover of things moveless", even though most of those Rica-s are subjected to the theology of the Sukta they are found in.
Either way, I'll still be intellectually honest and admit that the revelation from the Dual Ordinance of Shri Indra-Vishnu express a certain notion that Indra and Vishnu can surely be Equal:
"Ye Twain have conquered,
Never have Ye been conquered;
Never hath either of the
Twain been vanquished."
Never have Ye been conquered;
Never hath either of the
Twain been vanquished."
6.69.8.a
Last edited by a moderator: