Pointless Debate

[Marsh]

My position is not.
The claim that you KNOW one way or the other is.

Yes

Yes

It is arrogance if you claim YOU KNOW they do not exist.

Any more strawmen you want to try moving goal posts with?

The god Ganesha is a straw man? You think the Christian god (whichever version you care to choose) is more likely than Ganesha? I think they all stand on equal footing. I ask you again, am I arrogant for next accepting the possible existence of an elephant-headed god? Just so we are clear, even Yahweh of the Old Testament possessed a body.

I don't see that it is arrogant to reject emphatically the possible existence of supernatural beings for which there has never been any evidence.

 

[McBell]

The god Ganesha is a straw man? You think the Christian god (whichever version you care to choose) is more likely than Ganesha? I think they all stand on equal footing. I ask you again, am I arrogant for next accepting the possible existence of an elephant-headed god? Just so we are clear, even Yahweh of the Old Testament possessed a body.

I don't see that it is arrogant to reject emphatically the possible existence of supernatural beings for which there has never been any evidence.

Guess you prefer to beat up on your strawmen.

No worries mate, not everyone can keep up.