Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
Cosmopolitan....
However the whole precept seems to be... People bad ... business good
However the whole precept seems to be... People bad ... business good
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Political Simulator (policy-specific political compass)
- Thread starter Stalwart
- Start date
Augustus
…
That means you are not really a 'capitalist engineer'. The only things you've ever built are 'safe spaces' and you actually teach gender studies for a living.
You spend most of you spare time railing against the heteronormative patriarchy and empowering yourself through the medium of cooperative expressive dance.
The internet doesn't lie.
Last edited:
Sigh.....this explains my guilty pleasure of conceptual art.
Of course, it could mean that this particular political compass has some very real flaws...as a number of participants have suggested...
The site's just a massive list of categories. It doesn't ask any questions; there's nothing to fill out, and some of the categories seem already to have been rated.
How is this a survey???
Augustus
…
No, that is unpossible.
@Revoltingest is objectively a 'snowflake' who attends suburban dinner parties where he professes to be 'seriously into' Senegalese literature, and holds weekend camps where children play with gender neutral toys and engage in non-competitive activities which allow them to see the world through the eyes of those oppressed by Western liberal "democracy".
You have to be careful now as the word 'flaws' might well trigger him as it reminds him that the world we live in is a cruel place due to its 'flaws'.
Stalwart
Member
You adjust the variables according to your opinion/position, and the chart updates in real time to paint a picture of your political, social, and economic worldview as you go. Am I missing something, or is this really not the most obvious thing in the world?
illykitty
RF's pet cat
Oh, this is interesting! I've been playing around with it for a while to see the effects. It would be interesting if this was an actual simulation game, with people and income generation! Kind of like SimCity but running a country with different budgets, resources and policies. It's fun but here's my results if I decide on a few things (not sure on others)...
I imagine I run a small country, with picturesque mountains and dotted with beautiful clear lakes. The air is fresh and pure.
@Daemon Sophic we have similar results!
State: Technocratic Direct Democracy
Social: Secular Progressivism
System: Social Liberalism
Oh and my budget doesn't run a deficit... But then again, my military spending is 1% (pacifist policy, my military's main task is mainly for helping out delivering medicine in countries that need help and to have a tiny force for security). Lots of environmental spending, science and education. Don't want dirty air and a dumb population, especially that I favour technocracy and direct democracy. These don't work if the country's full of idiots.
Have a UBI and UBP, spending more on the former than latter. Not sure if they go hand in hand, the simulator doesn't specify. There's lots of places where it isn't specific enough, really.
Also, the bank is in public ownership, it's quite minimalistic. Maybe it's a digital currency, they store it and grant loans. I've put also natural resources into public ownership, because I think no one company should own what is "ours". Plus that generates some money for public spending, all the money goes around back towards funding goods and services of my citizens.
The rest, meh, could go either shared or public, I don't really know if I want to go full collectivist. I mean, that's what the direct democracy is for, people and the technocrats will chose what they want to try out. It would be up to them to decide which road to go down towards.
I imagine I run a small country, with picturesque mountains and dotted with beautiful clear lakes. The air is fresh and pure.
@Daemon Sophic we have similar results!
State: Technocratic Direct Democracy
Social: Secular Progressivism
System: Social Liberalism
Oh and my budget doesn't run a deficit... But then again, my military spending is 1% (pacifist policy, my military's main task is mainly for helping out delivering medicine in countries that need help and to have a tiny force for security). Lots of environmental spending, science and education. Don't want dirty air and a dumb population, especially that I favour technocracy and direct democracy. These don't work if the country's full of idiots.
Have a UBI and UBP, spending more on the former than latter. Not sure if they go hand in hand, the simulator doesn't specify. There's lots of places where it isn't specific enough, really.
Also, the bank is in public ownership, it's quite minimalistic. Maybe it's a digital currency, they store it and grant loans. I've put also natural resources into public ownership, because I think no one company should own what is "ours". Plus that generates some money for public spending, all the money goes around back towards funding goods and services of my citizens.
The rest, meh, could go either shared or public, I don't really know if I want to go full collectivist. I mean, that's what the direct democracy is for, people and the technocrats will chose what they want to try out. It would be up to them to decide which road to go down towards.
Last edited: