• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Poll: Do you want to meet the Christ with the "NEW Name"? OMG!

Do you want to meet the Christ with the "NEW Name"? OMG!


  • Total voters
    26

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
Poll: Do you want to meet the Christ with the "NEW Name"? OMG!

I can introduce you to the Christ with the "NEW Name"!

But, wait, you thought Jesus was going to be the alleged "Second Coming" of Christ? Nope, you were wrong. Jesus is never coming back for you if the Bible is correct and Jesus didn't lie.

If you don't believe Me, you should read what Jesus said in "Revelation 3:12".

I have much to say, but lets start off with one fact at a time, yes?

~PEACE~
I will quote Shakespeare: A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.

Here is the verse you speak of:

Rev 3:12 The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God. Never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name.

It doesn't sound like Jesus/Yeshua said He wasn't returning. It's so easy to pick and choose stray verses out of the Bible and comment on them and I am more interested on what they say, as a whole.
 
I will quote Shakespeare: A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.

Here is the verse you speak of:

Rev 3:12 The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God. Never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name.

It doesn't sound like Jesus/Yeshua said He wasn't returning. It's so easy to pick and choose stray verses out of the Bible and comment on them and I am more interested on what they say, as a whole.

It sounds like you might be a Christian?

I was a Christian too, until the year 2008, when I watched the movie called "Zeitgeist". This movie pretty much depicts that Jesus and the Bible are copied fables, or fallacies.

~PEACE~
 
It looks like most of the people that voted thus far said that they could care less about the Christ with the new Name.

I have a question: do you believe I, George Manuel Oliveira, am more credible than Jesus?

For example, its a fact that I am alive and I have said everything that I have, but its all just ancient hearsay when it comes to Jesus.

~PEACE~
 

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
It looks like most of the people that voted thus far said that they could care less about the Christ with the new Name.

I have a question: do you believe I, George Manuel Oliveira, am more credible than Jesus?

For example, its a fact that I am alive and I have said everything that I have, but its all just ancient hearsay when it comes to Jesus.

~PEACE~
We Christians don't really care so much about His name: He has been called Jesus, Yeshua, Yahshua, Y'shua, and Yehoshua, Joshua, etc. He was also called "Messiah" and "Christ" (and those two words mean the same thing). He was called a rabbi (teacher) and a prophet (son of man) We care about what He did and we care about what He taught (to be fair to nonbelievers, I will say "allegedly").
As for you being more or less credible than Jesus: Of course you are. I see your posts here, although I've never seen you in person and I don't know much about you outside of that you write well and that you used to be a Christian and are not one anymore. :)
 
We Christians don't really care so much about His name: He has been called Jesus, Yeshua, Yahshua, Y'shua, and Yehoshua, Joshua, etc. He was also called "Messiah" and "Christ" (and those two words mean the same thing). He was called a rabbi (teacher) and a prophet (son of man) We care about what He did and we care about what He taught (to be fair to nonbelievers, I will say "allegedly").
As for you being more or less credible than Jesus: Of course you are. I see your posts here, although I've never seen you in person and I don't know much about you outside of that you write well and that you used to be a Christian and are not one anymore. :)

Thanks for the polite rebuttal!

I understand your position... for the most part.

As you said, I used to be a Christian, and now I am not a Christian. If you watched that movie "Zeitgeist" that I posted here, you will see the reason why I lost My faith in Jesus and therefore Christianity... and that happened in the year 2008. It was some months later that I started to believe that I am the Christ, because I found out what My Name means and that My initials backwards is unequivocally OMG.

I believe people should think for themselves, and not have some cults ideology or doctrine that is almost forced on the sheep in the pews. I don't want people to believe Me because I say thus and so, I would rather people do their own research to come to their own conclusions.

I am just a guide to My own personal Truth: I am not a guide to every concievable truth or fact. I am limited to what I know or believe, but I am still learning and I hope that I can achieve enough scientific knowledge to help the world in more ways.

My Name is not Jesus, but I am like Jesus in some ways. You can't expect the "Second Coming" of Christ to be the same exact person as Jesus, because the times have changed, and even a clone of a person would live a different life compared to the origional.

As far as saying that you have not meet Me, you can watch videos of Me and see what I look like and what I talk like, etc.. You guys can know Me on (almost) a personal level. I can debate with you guys, give you My opinions, and just talk about whatever I feel like saying.

Hypothetically, if Jesus was empirically proven to be biblically credible, i.e., all the miracles, I would want to believe in Jesus too. I am not trying to eliminate Jesus, I am almost like trying to supplement Jesus... but if Jesus is a myth, then I would like to expose Jesus as a fraud.

I am not trying to tell people what to believe, because I am like an alternative Christ. I am not trying to be anyone except My Self.

You can know for a fact that I am alive, and I have videos of Myself to empirically prove it... Jesus does not have any such evidence.

Once again, thank you for being polite, and see if you can debunk ANYTHING that I have said.

~PEACE~
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I am now going to tell you nothing but FACTS:

Its a fact that My Name is "George Manuel Oliveira".

Its a fact that the initials for My Name is G.M.O..

Its a fact that GMO stands for Genetically Modified Organism.

Its a fact that My initials, GMO, backwards is OMG.

Its a fact that OMG stands for Oh My God.

Its a fact that My Name, George Manuel Oliveira, means "Farmer God is with us, olive tree".

Its a facts that in "Romans 11:16-26", the Bible mentions the "olive tree" many times.

Its a Biblical fact that Jesus said he would have a "new Name", if you read "Revelation 3:12".

Its a fact that My mothers name is Mary, and the Bible says that Christs mothers name was Mary.

Its a fact that My fathers name is Nuno. It is known that, "Mary knew no man." My dads name, Nuno, sounds exactly like saying the words "knew no". So if you use semantics, it sounds exactly the same if you say, "Mary knew no man," or "Mary... Nuno- man".

Its an empirical fact that I have many predictions, or prophecies, for the future.

Its an empirical fact that I have many paralells to the New Testament... and I can show this later if people want.

These are all irrefutable, demonstrable, empirical facts.

Any questions?

~PEACE~
Oh boy - another self-appointed internet messiah. That's wonderful - we had such a shortage.

o_O
 
Yes, it's a complete load.

How do you figure Zeitgeist is "a complete load"?

What is erroneous about the video Zeitgeist?

Where are the flaws in the movies logic?

I am not saying that the movie Zeitgeist should be considered as gospel, but it opened My eyes up and I then commenced in elightenment... or at least I became skeptical of religion, government, etc., and I watched many conspiracy "theory" videos in the year 2008.

So I would like to know the fallacies in the movie Zeitgeist, because I don't know anyone that can debunk it yet.

I could show you many more esoteric conspiracy "theories". I was on a mission in the year 2008 to start a revolution against the elites, and to expose their poisons and how the elites have ubiquitously enslaved the sheeple people via their central banks.

Now I want to spread My government to all corners of the globe. I would implement a global online government, where the people do all of the voting via their personal computers. This is the apex of government, where the people are in charge, and not the politicians that get bought out because of the lobbyists and big business.

I will be the King of My global online government that will commence in the near future.

~PEACE~
 

raph

Member
What is erroneous about the video Zeitgeist?
It is filled with false information. For example, there aren't as many similarities between Jesus and other gods, as the movie wants you to believe.
Where are the flaws in the movies logic?
The movie is manipulative, information are emphasized or hidden, whenever they fit the movie's agenda. For example, it says, that the Bible is an astrological book, cause the number 12 is in it. But it hides, that other numbers are also very much present, like 1, 7, 6 or 10.
So I would like to know the fallacies in the movie Zeitgeist, because I don't know anyone that can debunk it yet.
Zeitgeist, the movie Debunked - Introduction - Zeitgeist Exposed - Skeptic Project
I could show you many more esoteric conspiracy "theories". I was on a mission in the year 2008 to start a revolution against the elites, and to expose their poisons and how the elites have ubiquitously enslaved the sheeple people via their central banks.
The arrivals is a good one. But sadly also very false. Conspiracy theories are clinical paranoia brought to the internet.

If your cause is from God, it will prevail. Regards
 
Last edited:
It is filled with false information. For example, there aren't as many similarities between Jesus and other gods, as the movie wants you to believe.

The movie is manipulative, information are emphasized or hidden, whenever they fit the movie's agenda. For example, it says, that the Bible is an astrological book, cause the number 12 is in it. But it hides, that other numbers are also very much present, like 1, 7, 6 or 10.

Zeitgeist, the movie Debunked - Introduction - Zeitgeist Exposed - Skeptic Project

The arrivals is a good one. But sadly also very false. Conspiracy theories are clinical paranoia brought to the internet.

If your cause is from God, it will prevail. Regards

Thank you for your rebuttal.

I will try and read your link when I have more time, because I am interested in the truth, and not just some biased rhetoric.

Thanks.

~PEACE~
 
Jesus came in 2008?


If you watch this video, you will hear Me talk about My Life story, and how I came to the conclusion that I am the Christ... and much more.

~PEACE~
 
NASA May Have Just Discovered Faster than Light Travel


It looks like in the future, us humans will be able to travel the cosmos at the speed of light or maybe even greater speeds?

~PEACE~
 
Top