Booko said:
Porkchop:
You know, I'm not a Mormon and don't play one on teevee, but I find it really disingenuous of you to say you didn't realize this was an "anti" book. Or maybe you don't bother to read the back covers of books you read before you read the text inside?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0802456332/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-0288949-2408618#reader-link
The book is categorised as "cults and occult"
Porkchop was not being disingenuous, I have had that book on my shelf for years and she has never read it (until now). It is the testimony a a woman with historic links to the beginning of the mormon church, she presents the book not as "this is what mormons believe and this is what the bible says" but this is what the early mormon church was built upon and this is what went on. and not only that she provides documentation to substantiate most of her claims. It is the story of her heart wrenching decision to leave the mormon church for evangelical christianity and her love and concern for her mother who was so zealously and devoutly mormon. She actually says in the book that most mormons are unaware of a lot of the things the early mormon church taught
not that they believe them now. She gives much historical fact and if history is anti - mormon then so be it.
Porkchop was doing the right thing in asking a mormon if that particular teaching of Orson Pratts was a church doctrine, after all he is called a seer. At least she didn't read it and decide that this is what mormons believe.
Hm, let's see, the author has appeared in such films as "The Cult Explosion." Yes...perhaps that was a film about pyrotechnics in international terrorism.
This proves what? This proves that because her upbringing she is valued for her insights into LDS history. Like it or not the LDS church has always been viewed as a cult by mainstream Christianity so it is little wonder that she has been asked to speak on the subject. At least they are not asking people who have no idea what they are talking about.