• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Power Point Coup

exchemist

exchemist

Veteran Member
exchemist

exchemist

Veteran Member
Lain said:
These plans are a lot more mundane than what my mental image of plans for a coup would be, which are more along the lines of "bribe the military and murder opposition in the streets." Interesting to see reality vs. my imagination there.
Click to expand...
Milley had already told Trump - and the country - that route was a non-starter.
 
Twilight Hue

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
exchemist said:
Yes I saw this. So there was a coup plan. It was not just hyperventilation by overwrought libtards, after all.

Interesting that Meadows withdrew cooperation after this was unearthed in the documents he provided.
Click to expand...
About as reliable and accurate as Russian collusion maybe?
 
tytlyf

tytlyf

Not Religious
Twilight Hue said:
About as reliable and accurate as Russian collusion maybe?
Click to expand...
There was plenty of Russian collusion (helped enough to get him elected too). Fox and your far-right media telling you it's a hoax is the REAL hoax. Change your information sources. The Mueller report clearly outlines multiple instances of Russian collusion
 
Twilight Hue

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
tytlyf said:
There was plenty of Russian collusion (helped enough to get him elected too). Fox and your far-right media telling you it's a hoax is the REAL hoax. Change your information sources. The Mueller report clearly outlines multiple instances of Russian collusion
Click to expand...
Only in your opinion perhaps.

The courts have already determined things and it's officially settled.
 
Sgt. Pepper

Sgt. Pepper

All you need is love.
tytlyf said:
There was plenty of Russian collusion (helped enough to get him elected too). Fox and your far-right media telling you it's a hoax is the REAL hoax. Change your information sources. The Mueller report clearly outlines multiple instances of Russian collusion
Click to expand...

The Mueller report specifically stated that Trump was not exonerated, only that there was not enough evidence to charge him with a crime of colluding with Russia. However, he also indicated in his report that he could not charge Trump with obstruction of justice while he was a sitting president, but he said that Trump could still be charged after he has left office. Mueller stated that there is a long-standing Justice Department policy that a sitting president cannot be charged with a federal crime (OLC Opinion Explained: Why Robert Mueller Couldn't Indict Trump, Despite 10 Obstruction Incidents). Also, Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president. Lastly, Mueller stated that the only reason why Trump wasn't a Russian asset was because his aides didn't follow his orders (Mueller says Trump was unsuccessful in obstructing justice - but mostly because his aides didn't follow his orders). In conclusion, it is possible that Trump could still be charged with obstruction of justice.

Mueller says Trump's public acts can be considered obstruction

In his report, Mueller invites Congress to investigate Trump obstruction

Mueller: Congress still has ability to find the President obstructed justice

89dba51c-27b6-4690-9d85-123a8db7ce31.png
 
Last edited:
Sgt. Pepper

Sgt. Pepper

All you need is love.
Trump admits to obstruction of justice in Fox News interview

Former President Donald Trump bragged that he effectively obstructed justice during a Fox News interview.

Amid demands for Attorney General Merrick Garland to impanel a grand jury, Trump told Fox News that he simply had to fire former FBI Director James Comey. Otherwise, he could have been held accountable for his relationship with Russia during the 2016 election.

"Don't forget, I fired Comey," Trump bragged. "Had I not fired Comey, you might not be talking to me right now about a beautiful book about four years in the White House, and we'll see about the future. If I didn't fire Comey, they were looking to take down the president of the United States… I don't think could've survived if I didn't fire him."

The report published by former special counsel Robert Mueller said that they didn't even look at whether Trump broke the law during the 2016 election because he followed the Office of Legal Counsel's opinion that the president couldn't be indicted while in office. What Mueller did say was that he uncovered at least 10 examples of obstruction of justice from Trump attempting to stop his investigation. In the video below, Trump admits that firing Comey was one of those examples:

https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1467674845987016707.

Also, I suggest reading this article as another source for the story: 'I don't think I could have survived if I didn't fire him': Trump admits that firing James Comey helped him stay in the White House for four years - raising questions about obstruction of justice.
 
Last edited:
exchemist

exchemist

Veteran Member
Twilight Hue said:
Sorry. It's not a coup. Good lord.

People really need an education on what a coup is.
Click to expand...

That power point presentation lays out in detail a plan to declare the results of the election void, change the electoral college votes of key states and thereby get the loser reinstated as president, overturning the result of a free and fair vote.

That is a coup d'etat: "an illegal, unconstitutional seizure of power by a political faction, military or dictator."
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top