gmelrod
Resident Heritic
You've brought up a significant issue. It's extremely important and I've attempted to deal it out on philosophyforchristians.blogspot.com .
The constructs of philosophy -- determinism and freedom -- are not really suitable for describing theological concepts. Hence we have a problem, not only in how people outside of Christianity see these things discuss, but even within as philosophical theology takes hold more and more.
I agree (as a philosophy student first and foremost) that the dilemma of freedom and determinism posses a threat to classic theology. I think however that modern quantum theory could provide an escape. On the smallest level truly random uncaused events may be possible subject only to the loose guide of probability. Nothing is impossible just very unlikely. As these quantem events accumulate on the level of human awareness they probabilities become solid enough to appear as solid fact. While I am not at all a mathematician or quantum physicist this seems a reasonable account. The question remains though are quantum effects strong enough in the workings of the brain to allow for unlikely actions? I think this problem is still being studied. One problem is that our understanding of the brain is so new and our instaments for studying it are not sensitive enough yet. But that is science.
The multiverse is ruled by chaos - no need for an omniscient god.
While the multiverse theory is appealing on some levels it does raise other theological questions. Does Christ have to be sacrificed in all realities. Is there a Bible in all realities. Is it the same in ours as in others. If not which one is true. But (outside of science fiction of which I am a fan) we have no way to examine these alternate realities so to all appearences we are alone.
I think that foreknowledge which is produced scientificly is like any other kind of knowledge is not absolute. We can never be 100% certain in our predictions of any kind. So foreknowledge is like any other science, subject to change and failure. Revealed forknowledge like profecy is subject to other criticisms chiefly, how do you know that you are not delusoinal and decieved by your malfunctioning senses.
Oh and this thread began because the subject came up in another thread and it was suggested that I move it elsewhere. So I started a new one. The same issues keep geting brought up but are still fun to debate.
While no systematic is perfect, Calvinism certainly avoids the Pelagian and Socinian tendencies of Arminian systems. And it does put the election, predestination, and foreknowledge into a coherent bundle.
This sounds very smart but I am not familier with the terms. Though I think that Arminianism is an early form of religious tolerence. Can you help me out CRB?