leibowde84
Veteran Member
Yeah, sure. Obviously the subject would change from a painting to a person, but the rest is fine, with one caveat (see below).
Last edited:
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Present arguments for atheism
- Thread starter Desert Snake
- Start date
leibowde84
Veteran Member
It would be:
Whether A was honest or not is either true or false, objectively.
B's judgment as to A's honesty would be subjective.
Are you joking? People who believe God exists don't regard God as really factually existing? How do you manage to think and write this stuff?
McBell
Unbound
Garbage.
Pure and simple.
McBell
Unbound
I still say he is a bot.
Would explain his presentation of garbage, his ad nauseum repetition of garbage, his one track mind, his inability to stray off track....
Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
I disagree, just because I don't believe in somebody else's claim about a god does not mean I have to provide and alternate explanation. "I don't know" suffices.
dust1n
Zindīq
Would you say the same for fairies?
The reason you fail to believe it is because you already have an alternative explanation that suffices.
Sure, but 'suffices' can cover a LOOOOOOT of ground.
Nevertheless.