NetDoc said:
Yo man,
I already said in another post that I would vote for McCain FIRST.
Thats interesting. I thought this thread was about Hillary. Your implication was that I was a bigot just because I have doubts about this one womans candidacy credentials.
NetDoc said:
But this is not out of some misguided bull crap that she has sold her soul to the devil to gain power and influence.
I do not believe in the devil, nor did I say that.
NetDoc said:
The only thing that stops your venomous accusation from being outright libelous is that she IS a politician.
Lusting for power at all costs is not unique to Hillary. I would make the same assertion about Bill Frist or Randall Terry. Do you know a good libel lawyer?
NetDoc said:
I have CALLED you on this contention and so far you have blamed her husband (guilt by association) and have appealed to a dubious higher authority, yet without any details as to her egregious sins.
I was attempting to be civil and not make this a Hillary bashing session. Sigh
very well; most women, after several UNMISTAKEABLE occurrences of marriage infidelity would distance themselves from the offending spouse. If nothing else, this marriage has
the appearance of as marriage of convenience. Hey, it happens all the time in situations of royalty and wealth. Need I go into the disappearance of the TravelGate records which were mysteriously found in her residence? This amounts to, at best, obstruction of justice and at worst a cover up.
Dick Morris, a dubious higher authority? That would be like saying Carl Rove has no idea what is going on in the Bush Whitehouse. Give me a break! Dick Morris describes the business dealings of Mrs. Clinton as downright venomous. If you want more details, read his book do some of your own research.
NetDoc said:
I sincerely believe that you can tell a tree by it's fruit. In this respect you are merely a pawn for the Rush Limbaughs of the world, who's only goal is to SMEAR the names of their political enemies. I would offer to buy you one of his ties to show your allegiance to smear campaigns but I refuse to support someone who's sole purpose is to create cash flow by assassinating someone else's character.
Do I listen to talk radio? You bet. However, I listen to Rush and Air America equally. I much prefer Neal Boortz over both. In fact, I am not even a Republican. Both parties have become very adept at smearing each other. This is not a new tactic. Politicians have been smearing since before Julius Caesar. If you want to buy me a tie, I would rather have one with Southpark characters. Kenny is my favorite.
NetDoc said:
Of course it is your right free to hate freely and to help keep politics mean spirited; that's your choice. In the same vein, I am allowed to expose such attempts to impugn the honor of ANY candidate merely because the Republican spin factory feels they have a right to do so.
Oh yes, hate and mean-spirited. Those are the adjectives that people throw around when they lack real substance. Neither party corners the market on spin. And it is always seen as dirty politics when the other guy is doing it.
tkdrocks said:
Now, I will ask a question: What are Hillary's accomplishments as a Senator? Please list the legislation that she has authored or even assisted with. I think it would be more fair to judge a candidate on their record over sound bytes.
Yeah, I could not think of any either.