mr.guy
crapsack
At the Victor's suggestion, i thought i'd start a thread where pro-lifers could debate amongst themselves the merits of their personal ethics, arguments for, and diversity of general viewpoint of what the pro-live movement entails.
Ground rule:
For the sake of this thread, i'll insist that a pro-lifer be defined by no more or less then their objection to the legal status of abortion upon demand. If you are permissive or tolerant of the status quo, you do not meet the requirements for entering this debate.
While all can contribute, i must insist that no-one falling short of the above requirement challenge, rebut or generally hassle the participants for whom this thread is reserved for.
OP -> What is the variance among pro-lifers?
Ground rule:
For the sake of this thread, i'll insist that a pro-lifer be defined by no more or less then their objection to the legal status of abortion upon demand. If you are permissive or tolerant of the status quo, you do not meet the requirements for entering this debate.
While all can contribute, i must insist that no-one falling short of the above requirement challenge, rebut or generally hassle the participants for whom this thread is reserved for.
OP -> What is the variance among pro-lifers?