ndless has a magic goal post instead of a valid definition of 'new' information. As soon as the ball looks like it's about to go in the back of the net they miraculously move and Endless pretends he's made a brilliant diving save.
But i haven't - when have i changed what constitutes new information. I gave my definition and have not changed it. I also commented on Opethian's posting from talk origins - to which neither of you have corrected me - because i am not wrong.
The burden is on you to explain how a mutation changing a base pair consitutes new information and not just new content. It is up to you to explain how duplication constitutes new information - when it is a duplication of existing information. I have outlined why these are not information - you have merely claimed that they are. Please post something constructive as to how these constitute new information.
I'm not about to let this conversation now drop down a level - you are capable of continuing this on this level Opethian.