Proved: Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. is mentioned in the Bible

[Dawood Ahmad]

Why? You claimed that Muhammad was the only notable prophet after Jesus. These are examples of other prophets, showing that your claim was false. How is that another debate? It seems like you don't have any evidence to support your claim that Muhammad is referred to in the Bible. Your opinion on the subject seems to be grounded in appreciation for Muhammad, which could cause a bias.

Do you mean its a Prophet other than Muhammad S.A.W.?
Because I'm proving the prophecy of someone other than Modern day Christian beliefs...

 

[outhouse]

the Islamic system is based on historical accuracy

Then why doesn't one credible historian in the whole world use the Koran for any aspect for research into the historical Jesus? or Israelites?

 

[outhouse]

Because I'm proving the prophecy of someone other than Modern day Christian beliefs...

Your only proving bias Dawood.

You have proved nothing at all; historically speaking

 

[mahasn ebn sawresho]

Do you mean its a Prophet other than Muhammad S.A.W.?
Because I'm proving the prophecy of someone other than Modern day Christian beliefs...

There is no prophet after Christ
Christ is the Savior
There is a big difference between Muhammad and Christ
Mohammed came from a meeting with a man Female
I got a sexual relationship between them
But Christ is the Word of God
Thus, we believe
Christ has no parallel
Christ is alive
While Mohammed is dead
We follow Christ and live , but we do not follow the Dead Mohammed

 

[mahasn ebn sawresho]

Do you mean its a Prophet other than Muhammad S.A.W.?
Because I'm proving the prophecy of someone other than Modern day Christian beliefs...

There is a difference between Muhammad and Christ
Christ says words
( From declaring his faith and follow me does not come into judgment,
) This is the word of Christ
We follow the life in Christ and with Christ
While Mohammed Dead and buried in Medina says ( you are dead , as well as those are Dead ) This verse of the Holy
The Koran also says ( and you are you going to hell, and this provision is from your Lord and was serving ending )
Go and browse Read the Koran and this verse and Interpretations
That is, you will visit the hell even if followed Prophet Muhammad buried

 

[mahasn ebn sawresho]

Do you mean its a Prophet other than Muhammad S.A.W.?
Because I'm proving the prophecy of someone other than Modern day Christian beliefs...

I repeat my words to you
Since you say that 75 of the Gospel is invalid
So you will not be able to be relied upon to prove the prophecy of Mohammad and the Dead buried in Medina
Argument coming in and your subject failed

 

[Muffled]

So, you see Muhammad as a liar?

I don't believe so because He never claimed to be the Christ or Jesus. I believe he never claimed to be the Parac lete either and from what I have read in the Qu'ran doesn't even believe in the Paraclete.

 

[Muffled]

yes --i realy of that mohammed is lie when he said he is massenger of god
Yes this is true
Many of evidence
1. The transfer of Mohammed wrote the Jews and the Christians and Alencary
He was working on a big fraud and misleading
2. Mohammed morality is conclusive evidence that he is not a prophet
3. Mohammed's teachings do not belong to God that we know

I beleive your arguments do not support this conclusion.

1. I believe there is no evidence to support this view.

2. I believe there is nothing in Mohammed's morality that is inconsistent with the Biblical view of morality.

3. I believe there is no evidence to support this view.

 

[Muffled]

I'm not sure I can translate any of his comments. I am very confused.

i believe the translator has a tendency to do that. You should see the episode of Bones (US TV Show) where a translator translates a poem from Farsi into English. It is hilarious.

I believe to put it in my own words he was saying that a judge will throw out tainted evidence. However for debate purposes I believe one has to prove that each portion is tainted and not throw out the baby with the bathwater.

PS: The expression "don't throw out the baby with the bathwater" basicly means that one must keep what is important and discard that which is worthless.

 

[leibowde84]

Do you mean its a Prophet other than Muhammad S.A.W.?
Because I'm proving the prophecy of someone other than Modern day Christian beliefs...

Joseph Smith is not a "Christian Prophet." He is a "Morman Prophet." Only the Jesus Christ Chruch of Latterday Saints (Morman Church) sees him as a prophet. So, he would be in exactly the same category as Muhammad in regards to Christianity.

Also, why on earth would the only prophet who would fit into this description be non-Christian?

You still haven't provided any evidence as to why Muhammad would have to be the one mentioned in the Bible. You have merely provided an argument that "makes sense," which could be made about many men who claimed to be prophets for God.

 

[Muffled]

You shouldn't use the word "proved" here. There exist quite a few other prophets claiming to descent from Jesus prophetic cycle, such as Joseph Smith, Mani, Baha'u'llah and many others. Any follower of these religions would say the verses predict their prophets.

Also, I don't think you know what the Quran meant by saying that the previous books were corrupted.

There were no evil man or men stealing the original Torah and since then made his own copy of it or Jesus traveled to Rome, met Pilate, Pilate then burned the Gospel, killed Jesus and then the Roman Christians demanded to read the Bible and Pilate sent his best authors to imitate the original Gospel from the surviving texts and called it for the first Bible.

These Gospels and Torahs were orally transmitted for many years and since then embellished greatly during the transmission, the original texts were just lost, not "corrupted" or "altered."

I believe they would be just as wrong. The verses evidently declare the coming of the Paraclete and no one else.

I believe that is a misinterpretation. The Qu'ran is actually saying that the words of men corrupt the texts just as those who misinterpret the Qu'ran do.

I believe there is only minimal embellishment and nothing of importance.

I think it is reasonable to saythat they haven't been preserved as far as we know. Considering that we have the Paraclete, if we lacked the text completely it could be reproduced by what the Paraclete tells us.