No, it actually shows that the Penrose proposal is wrong. The basic paradox still remains.
Quantum mechanics is still the best description and is still probabilistic in essence.
Disagree as usual on your use of the term probabilistic. I believe this research and other recent research like what @LegionOnomaMoi cited are leading to a non-paradox predictable and consistent explanation of these relationships in Quantum Mechanics. Penrose may not be totally wrong. It indicates he is working on a better work, an dI will look forward to what he comes up with.
Last edited: