• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Quantum Mechanics becomes less mysterious.

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
No, it actually shows that the Penrose proposal is wrong. The basic paradox still remains.

Quantum mechanics is still the best description and is still probabilistic in essence.

Disagree as usual on your use of the term probabilistic. I believe this research and other recent research like what @LegionOnomaMoi cited are leading to a non-paradox predictable and consistent explanation of these relationships in Quantum Mechanics. Penrose may not be totally wrong. It indicates he is working on a better work, an dI will look forward to what he comes up with.
 
Last edited:

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Disagree as usual on your use of the term probabilistic. I believe this research and other recent research like what @LegionOnomaMoi cited are leading to a non-paradox predictable and consistent explanation of these relationships in Quantum Mechanics. Penrose may not be totally wrong. It indicates he is working on a better work, an dI will look forward to what he comes up with.

Probabilistic: quantum mechanics predicts probability distributions, not what happens in individual events.

The Penrose proposal was geared to 'explain' wave function collapse, which is what gives individual events. But, the predictions of this proposal have been shown to be wrong.

So, what is left, is the standard quantum mechanics, which predicts probabilities.

QM actually has no paradoxes internally. The problems all come from trying to interpret quantum phenomena classically: with particles in definite locations with definite properties at all times.

But we *know* that is a type of interpretation that cannot work.
 
Top