• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Question about oxygen levels

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
No. It shows the rocks to be old, not necessarily the mountains.
Some of the high-altitude ranges we have today, probably existed before the Flood (the Bible doesn’t say), but were not as high (which the Scriptures do indicate, at Psalm 104.)


How can I ‘misrepresent your position,’ when you’ve never defined what your position is? By your own statements, apparently you think God is not really powerful; you keep trying to apply natural methodology, to an obvious divine event. In so doing, you are ignoring the evidences that
resulted from it. Like the cultural legends it inspired, both about the Flood & the myths with the common thread of the ‘gods sleeping with women’; like the lack of the 1000-sq-miles of debris from the Grand Canyon (which the Flood washed away) and from other areas; the mammals’ remains within the Permafrost (some of which have been discovered extremely well-preserved); the Festival celebrations of the dead from various cultures, held around their respective dates that coincide with the same time of year as the Flood. Etc.

That’s a lot of coincidences!
I’m just not that naïve to accept them as such.

When you grasp what 1 John5:19 & Revelation 12:9 is telling us, then you’ll have a better understanding of my skepticism about what is “accepted.”

SZ goes on about “testable hypotheses” and how there’s no evidence without it, but I bet you have no qualms “accepting” the explanation of how the Earth was formed & how it established an orbit ‘by natural forces’.
Science posits a scenario that has no support from “testable hypotheses.”
But it doesn’t stop them, though.
Lol.
You're doing it again. I have defined my position numerous times.

I have made no such statements. That is you trying to impugn my position with attacks on my beliefs.

The ice is getting thin where you are skating.

I am not ignoring the evidence. You haven't presented evidence. You have presented claims that you declare are evidence. It is not me that is handwaving and attacking the beliefs of others.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Maybe you should keep up with what you reply too. My comment was about available food for animals after the water receded, nothing about animals coming to anyone.

After a year on a boat with deadly concentrations of methane and the accompanying odors even gravel was probably palatable.
 

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
No. It shows the rocks to be old, not necessarily the mountains.
Some of the high-altitude ranges we have today, probably existed before the Flood (the Bible doesn’t say), but were not as high (which the Scriptures do indicate, at Psalm 104.)


How can I ‘misrepresent your position,’ when you’ve never defined what your position is? By your own statements, apparently you think God is not really powerful; you keep trying to apply natural methodology, to an obvious divine event. In so doing, you are ignoring the evidences that
resulted from it. Like the cultural legends it inspired, both about the Flood & the myths with the common thread of the ‘gods sleeping with women’; like the lack of the 1000-sq-miles of debris from the Grand Canyon (which the Flood washed away) and from other areas; the mammals’ remains within the Permafrost (some of which have been discovered extremely well-preserved); the Festival celebrations of the dead from various cultures, held around their respective dates that coincide with the same time of year as the Flood. Etc.

That’s a lot of coincidences!
I’m just not that naïve to accept them as such.

When you grasp what 1 John5:19 & Revelation 12:9 is telling us, then you’ll have a better understanding of my skepticism about what is “accepted.”

SZ goes on about “testable hypotheses” and how there’s no evidence without it, but I bet you have no qualms “accepting” the explanation of how the Earth was formed & how it established an orbit ‘by natural forces’.
Science posits a scenario that has no support from “testable hypotheses.”
But it doesn’t stop them, though.
Lol.
No one has ever been able to associate cultural legends with anything other than the cultures in which they originated. You are claiming that the existence of legends validifies the subject of the legends. That is ridiculous thinking and means that Zeus, Thor, Bigfoot and elves are real too.

The debris from the Grand Canyon are in the Gulf of California. You have no evidence for a flood so you cannot claim that it washed away all of the eroded material of the Grand Canyon. You have accepted something without evidence and are using that to explain everything else so it fits with what you accepted. Your efforts are an excellent example of confirmation bias.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
No one has ever been able to associate cultural legends with anything other than the cultures in which they originated. You are claiming that the existence of legends validifies the subject of the legends. That is ridiculous thinking and means that Zeus, Thor, Bigfoot and elves are real too.

The debris from the Grand Canyon are in the Gulf of California. You have no evidence for a flood so you cannot claim that it washed away all of the eroded material of the Grand Canyon. You have accepted something without evidence and are using that to explain everything else so it fits with what you accepted. Your efforts are an excellent example of confirmation bias.
Actually a lot of it is in Central California. Prime farmland. Plate tectonics and all that.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Agreed. And none of it was magically disappeared by a mythical flood that is inconsistent with the evidence.
The Gulf of California is only a bit over five million years old. The Grand Canyon is quite a bit older.

Gulf of California - Wikipedia evidence is widely interpreted by geologists as,the middle of the Gulf along the seabed.

The Grand Canyon began to form about thirty million years ago at least. Most of the sediments from the Grand Canyon are not in the Gulf because it did not exist at that time.
 
Top