Jumi
Well-Known Member
That's what everyone seems to want to know, including me.So what "highly evolved" means.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's what everyone seems to want to know, including me.So what "highly evolved" means.
No, no, no! First you say "they shall add our biological and technological distinctiveness to their own," then you say "resistance is futile."Resistance is futile. They shall add our distinctiveness to their own.
That's what everyone seems to want to know, including me.
No, you can still have genetic drift.I don't view it in terms of maximum of something.
It's about adapting to the point that allele frequencies are stable, ie, optimized for the organism in its environment.
No.
it's all my speculation & opining.
I allowed for that in my highly unprofessional & unresearched speculative definition.No, you can still have genetic drift.
That's what everyone seems to want to know, including me.
I'd answer both yes and no if it was a choice.Huh? If 'everyone wants to know', that, then why all the votes that aren't that option 'I don't know'?
Because the question is nonsensical and ill-defined.Huh? If 'everyone wants to know', that, then why all the votes that aren't that option 'I don't know'?
Because the question is nonsensical and ill-defined.
It is still ill defined nonsense to any biologist.
That's the logical fallacy know as argumentum ad populum, and yes, it is still ill-defined nonsense.
There is no such thing as a more or less evolved creature. The term itself doesn't make sense since there is no scale of evolution that has a beginning and an end where things on this side of the scale are "more" evolved and the things on the other side are "less" evolved. We can say that humans are more complex than cockroaches but even that doesn't mean we are more evolved. One could say that we are not more evolved that single celled bacteria. Far more complex yes but not "more" evolved.Question for evolutionists, and creationists can enter the discussion as well, since this DIR is about evolution & creationism.
Is the cockroach a 'highly evolved' creature? Is it 'more evolved', than say, humans? Why or why not?
Question for evolutionists, and creationists can enter the discussion as well, since this DIR is about evolution & creationism.
Is the cockroach a 'highly evolved' creature? Is it 'more evolved', than say, humans? Why or why not?