• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Question For The Group

Kathryn

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Pogo said:
"And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning?

"So it'd be interesting to check that."

It was a stupid and ignorant statement to make as anybody who has ever read a bleach bottle would know, It was just another example of his thinking he knew more than his advisers and a reason to ignore him as a position of intelligence and authority.
Had any one else suggested injecting (didn't say he said swallowing) bleach would you not severely question his suggestion of its wisdom?
No you wouldn't but here you are carrying water for the speaker of absurdities because? Reasons?
Click to expand...
No, I don't believe he ever said anything about swallowing any bleach. Please provide a source for that assertion. Thanks.
 
Bear Wild

Bear Wild

Well-Known Member
Kathryn said:
No, I don't believe he ever said anything about swallowing any bleach. Please provide a source for that assertion. Thanks.
Click to expand...
I get it. It was my error overlapping what citizen did who tried drinking some bleach related to his briefing about injecting disinfectants into the body. Hopefully you can let that mistake go now or you can keep repeating it over and over. It will not change the fact that Trump as president had no clear understanding of the danger he suggested, But he did pass the dementia test years ago. I wonder how well he would do now since the test was difficult for him back then.
 
I

Ignatius A

Well-Known Member
Bear Wild said:
I get it. It was my error overlapping what citizen did who tried drinking some bleach related to his briefing about injecting disinfectants into the body. Hopefully you can let that mistake go now or you can keep repeating it over and over. It will not change the fact that Trump as president had no clear understanding of the danger he suggested, But he did pass the dementia test years ago. I wonder how well he would do now since the test was difficult for him back then.
Click to expand...
Anyone stupid enough to drink bleach needs to be in a home for their own protection. Trump isnt the problem there.
 
SkepticThinker

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Ignatius A said:
A+ for the rambling post. The dems have a candidate selected by the bosses of the party the people of the party. The Biden administration pressured facebook and likely others to censor information. I'm sorry but the ramblings of a Democrat don't really impress me much.
Click to expand...
The people seem quite content with their choice.

That's why the Republicans are losing their minds over it. ;)
 
I

Ignatius A

Well-Known Member
SkepticThinker said:
The people seem quite content with their choice.

That's why the Republicans are losing their minds over it. ;)
Click to expand...
Be a good boy and vote for who your party tells you to vote for. You dems could save time and money but just letting the bosses tell you who your candidates will be. It will be an interesting experiment. I can't wait to see how it works out.
 
SkepticThinker

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Kathryn said:
Yada yada yada. No thanks. Prior to having the vaccine, I knew several people who got COVID and it was a big fat nothing. The only person I know who died of COVID had had five vaccinations against it. I've had three and three is enough.
Click to expand...
You go ahead and rely on your personal anecdotes.

Those of us who want to be informed will rely on the actual data.
 
SkepticThinker

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Ignatius A said:
Be a good boy and vote for who your party tells you to vote for. You dems could save time and money but just letting the bosses tell you who your candidates will be. It will be an interesting experiment. I can't wait to see how it works out.
Click to expand...
Sure beats being in a cult and worshipping a rapist fraud.

Harris is next in line to the Presidency, right now, at this very moment. She secured the support of 99% of the delegates needed. She has closed the gap in the polls and overtaken Trump in some places. Democratic voters don't seem all that upset about it. Neither do "Never Trumpers."

You guys are shaking in your boots and it shows in your posts. ;)
 
I

Ignatius A

Well-Known Member
SkepticThinker said:
Sure beats being in a cult and worshipping a rapist fraud.

Harris is next in line to the Presidency, right now, at this very moment. She secured the support of 99% of the delegates needed. She has closed the gap in the polls and overtaken Trump in some places. Democratic voters don't seem all that upset about it. Neither do "Never Trumpers."

You guys are shaking in your boots and it shows in your posts. ;)
Click to expand...
A rape that occured when precisely? Oh thats right the "victim" didn't even know in what year the supposed rape happened.

Be a good boy and just pull the lever for the kamal like you're told
 
Soandso

Soandso

ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
Ignatius A said:
A rape that occured when precisely? Oh thats right the "victim" didn't even know in what year the supposed rape happened.

Be a good boy and just pull the lever for the kamal like you're told
Click to expand...

So Trump was found, by a jury of his peers who were convinced by all the the evidence, to have raped E. Jean Carrol after only 3 hours of deliberation. Some of these people on that jury were Trump supporters before the case

Given all this, why do you automatically assume that she was lying, the evidence wasn't compelling enough, and the jury was wrong in it's conclusion? Especially in light of how Trump has a long history of sexually abusing women

en.m.wikipedia.org

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org

The dude literally brags about grabbing women by their generals unprompted. He's a molester by his own admission

Why are you giving him so much benefit of the doubt?
 
Last edited:
SkepticThinker

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Ignatius A said:
A rape that occured when precisely? Oh thats right the "victim" didn't even know in what year the supposed rape happened.

Be a good boy and just pull the lever for the kamal like you're told
Click to expand...
A rape that was adjudicated in a court of law by a judge and jury of his peers.

I love how suddenly the "law and order" crowd doesn't care a whit for law and order when it comes to their Dear Leader.
You're in a cult.
 
Kathryn

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
SkepticThinker said:
You go ahead and rely on your personal anecdotes.

Those of us who want to be informed will rely on the actual data.
Click to expand...
Alrighty then. Because of course there's no chance you could be fooled by data. Meanwhile, thanks, I WILL rely on my personal experiences.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top