when did doors denounce the lhp?
I denounced Jason's LHP, and we all know how fundies feel if it's not their way.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
when did doors denounce the lhp?
If your going to constantly cycle through labels as if they insufficiently describe what you're looking for then you are searching for an identity. Which if you take offense to then it may seem a little more evident.
Just because I change my lable to say Gnosticism and start arguing for it does not make me insecure and without identity, more likely it makes me intellectually evolved.
I denounced Jason's LHP, and we all know how fundies feel if it's not their way.
i like to refer to myself as a coreistI denounced Jason's LHP, and we all know how fundies feel if it's not their way.
Lol jason i can't make a new satanism. And you wonder why you get called a fundi. Relax man. Ill be totaly ceral manbearpig style
I think this sums it up.
Your joking, right? One doesn't need to change their labels to temporarily think from the point of view of another person in order to understand that system. I've done this many times with other religions but never once have I changed my superfical labels in any capacity.
I merely looked at it from their point of view, and then considered it. That doesn't mean I have to go for weeks on end saying im X when in reality I am just Y that is pretending to be X because I lack the mental skills to see X's point of view.
I don't have to act it to understand it. Either you lack serious abstract thinking or you really are full of it.
I thought you said you didn't ever come here because you were not considered LHP or some another, perhaps I misread your post. I thought you personally said it.
But maybe you should get your head out of your *** because I have never before, NEVER ONCE said who is and who isn't a Satanist, much less who is and who isn't LHP. I am the most accepting person when it comes to those who call themselves Satanists, even when they spit on my face because I'm a "devil worshipper" just today I was told that I seem to think that all versions of Satanism deserve to be called Satanism, and I do. I am one of the most liberal people when it comes to who calls themselves a Satanist or who calls themselves LHP.
I just want you to take your petty ******** out of the DIR as you
1) Hijacked this topic
2) insulted my friends and me with personal insults several times
3) and are being a general antagonistic jerk.
The DIR are for discussion and fellowship, not your little ego trips and personal squabbles and debates. How about you do yourself a favor before you get banned?
Well thank you i guess i should get working on that. i might need some help tweeking and adding symbols etcNo, what I said was that if you make a mock religion that doens't incorperate at least Satanic symbolism that you would get in trouble for DIR violations and cautioned you against it.
I then said that if you were serious about either including Satan or the symbolism of Satan then I would gladly be one of the ones to welcomes you into our DIR.
Get your facts straight.