-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Questioning Reality
- Thread starter wizanda
- Start date
What if I told you that true oneness would need letting go of conceptions of God?
I'd agree, there are many flawed concepts of God....
Which is why used the term CPU, from what i saw within my NDE, that makes more sense of what we find within many of the religious texts, and quantum physics.
There is also the aspect, that concepts of God actually cause division among us, and thus distract from Oneness between us.....
Yet overall, if we came to a scientific understanding of the reality around us, people would be more accepting of a quantifiable source of reality.
allfoak
Alchemist
The MATHEMATICAL FINGERPRINT OF GOD is the number 9
There is more to numbers than the mere quantities we assign them. Numbers are alive. They structure our waking reality. All the great mystics and philosophers throughout the ages understood this numeric universe. It won’t be long until we are able to manufacture energy and reshape our world the way nature intended, through implosion rather than explosion.
The principles of Vortex Math and the underlying ideologies of this forgotten science are resurfacing. This lost numerical art is a portal to understanding the nature of reality, and the psychological implications gained from such introspection are paramount to the evolution of the world soul.
http://blog.world-mysteries.com/science/why-did-tesla-say-that-369-was-the-key-to-the-universe/
There is more to numbers than the mere quantities we assign them. Numbers are alive. They structure our waking reality. All the great mystics and philosophers throughout the ages understood this numeric universe. It won’t be long until we are able to manufacture energy and reshape our world the way nature intended, through implosion rather than explosion.
The principles of Vortex Math and the underlying ideologies of this forgotten science are resurfacing. This lost numerical art is a portal to understanding the nature of reality, and the psychological implications gained from such introspection are paramount to the evolution of the world soul.
http://blog.world-mysteries.com/science/why-did-tesla-say-that-369-was-the-key-to-the-universe/
allfoak
Alchemist
You would be correct.
It becomes impossible to even discuss the idea when one considers that reality consists of nothing as well as all things.
Quantum physics? What role would they have in there?
Many would. Would it be worth it, though?There is also the aspect, that concepts of God actually cause division among us, and thus distract from Oneness between us.....
Yet overall, if we came to a scientific understanding of the reality around us, people would be more accepting of a quantifiable source of reality.
Rick O'Shez
Irishman bouncing off walls
Could you briefly define what you mean by "Oneness"?
And "Oneness" as opposed to what? Duality? Negativity? What exactly?
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
You are using a definition of nothing that doesn't quite match the actuality. So, in some contexts, I have no problem with your usage; however, in this context, it doesn't work.
allfoak
Alchemist
I don't want to argue with you but i do not understand your contextual argument.
Reality is and it is not.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
there is no one else in my head.....
When Dr Michio Kaku says, "the mind of God is like cosmic music, resonating throughout 11 dimensional hyperspace".... He is including his knowledge of string theory, etc, where they can see a bright energy source at the 11th dimension.
This I've experience in my NDE, the lowest dimension is Hell, which is dark (low vibration), the higher you ascend towards the singularity, the brighter it gets.
Yes, as in a reliable understanding, it would change many peoples perspective; to something that can be used to advance our technology, unite the religious, and change our perception of right and wrong, to being about frequency....
There are loads more reasons, to educate people about what is really going on; think the main problem tho, is that we're in a place between Heaven and Hell, with matter made out of what many deem evil (low frequency consciousness), thus people are full of Ego, and very argumentative.
The OP uses Øneness, so will define both for you:
- Oneness (1) is the unity between matter.
- It is where people have a single focal point, and thus an interconnected consciousness, which brings a sense of rapport.
- It is also the name i shouted from Hell, to be brought up to Heaven; where Heaven can be called Oneness...Yet on a closer examination based on multiple religions, and much debate online, realized that 0neness (Ø) is a much better name for it.
- So to define 0neness (0), is that where as Oneness has a sense of being one; 0neness is equal to Nirvana.
- It is complete in its emptiness, in this state 'it is a welcome accession to all things' (Tao).
- Due to its nothingness, all things are made manifest by its complete selflessness.
1 - 1 = 0 =
Oneness is felt at a football match, at a concert, at nightclubs, in churches; anywhere where people come together under a single focal point.
Last edited:
For oneness, even a true conception of god (assuming there is such a thing) must be discarded. If you seek oneness, you have no more need for true conceptions of god as you do for false.
That would be a oneness based on compromise, to all get along, rather than a Oneness based on all the knowledge accumulated, and correlated as a whole....
Yet i get the point, there would be far more oneness, if people weren't arguing over which God is best; which then defeats the whole point of there being one God, and it being One.
That would be a oneness based on compromise, to all get along, rather than a Oneness based on all the knowledge accumulated, and correlated as a whole....
Yet i get the point, there would be far more oneness, if people weren't arguing over which God is best; which then defeats the whole point of there being one God, and it being One.
Nope. You missed the point. And your assumptions about "compromise" and such are based on a misreading of what I was saying.
Explain your point better then, i just took that one line of thought from it....
Explain your point better then, i just took that one line of thought from it....
I'm going to start a thread on it sometime today. I'll explain it there.
I hadn't.... It makes sense in many ways, would like to get away from beliefs, and deal with the evidence we've got from the many sources.
Personally wouldn't exclude all religious texts, just because believers follow it....
As the person writing it might have been divinely inspired, and only with careful investigation of the evidence can we be sure.
What context were you asking in tho?
I think true Oneness would in practice demand letting go of god-concepts, or at least of expecting people to "agree" about what they "truly are/truly mean".
It is IMO a full-blown defect for any faith to expect, let alone demand, some sort of god-belief.
It is IMO a full-blown defect for any faith to expect, let alone demand, some sort of god-belief.