MohammadPali
Active Member
As always with people like him they are into the history that fits their own agenda.
Everything else is either propaganda or outright falsifications.
Because it doesn't fit the Zionist agenda ?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As always with people like him they are into the history that fits their own agenda.
Everything else is either propaganda or outright falsifications.
Yeah, a lot of muslims like him.tovia singer
Wait, what?Jews and muslims before 1948 always got along.
Because it doesn't comport with actual history.Because it doesn't fit the Zionist agenda ?
Maimonides was was a physician for an arab king for many years, and there was peace.
If you had to choose to live between christian or muslims during the crusades what would you choose ?
it wasn't that bad
I'm not trying to distort history. Come on speak the truth.
Neither was Yasser Arafat and his made up liberation org.
So Maimonides didn't have to write his Iggeret HaShmad and Iggeret Teiman because things weren't that bad. Got it.The jews and muslims got along prior to 1948, it wasn't that bad. I'm not saying there wasn't issues. Ofcourse there was, political ones. I am talking on a general footing, many jews trusted arabs, and arabs vice versa. Maimonides was was a physician for an arab king for many years, and there was peace.
So you want Jews to choose being killed or only oppressed as second class citizens THREATENED with being killed. Gawrsh, you're right..things were just awesome.up to the 1800's jews lived amongst arabs peacefully.
You mean like the leader of a group called the PLO who was born in Egypt?As a matter of fact the israeli spokes man the last 5 or 6 maybe more, was not even born in israel lol. And he talks about history being on the zionist side, he wasn't even born in ISRAEL lol.
So... how did Rambam end up in Egypt?
Any reason why he left Sepharad?
I'd head east to the Mongols.
If you were a Muslim that is.
You shouldn't lie.
So Maimonides didn't have to write his Iggeret HaShmad and Iggeret Teiman because things weren't that bad. Got it.
So you want Jews to choose being killed or only oppressed as second class citizens THREATENED with being killed. Gawrsh, you're right..things were just awesome.
You mean like the leader of a group called the PLO who was born in Egypt?
So instead of dealing with the facts which contradict your stated position, you try to shift focus and say "you did it too."Don't act like your crap dont stink either.
I don't recall saying anything about this. I was questioning your positive assertion.You had many jewish kings and generals who murdered christians and arabs in the past.
Your opinion of him isn't the issue. The issue was your attempt to cast aspersions on a spokesman for Israel by looking at where he was born. When I point out that birth location is often unrelated to a person's political ideology, you inject your not caring for him. Irrelevant. What matters is that your point is rendered null.yassers father was born in gaza. I don't care for him or the plo.
So instead of dealing with the facts which contradict your stated position, you try to shift focus and say "you did it too."
I don't recall saying anything about this. I was questioning your positive assertion.
If you can't handle your own claims don't try to evade them by pointing out anything else.
Your opinion of him isn't the issue. The issue was your attempt to cast aspersions on a spokesman for Israel by looking at where he was born. When I point out that birth location is often unrelated to a person's political ideology, you inject your not caring for him. Irrelevant. What matters is that your point is rendered null.
Fascinating. You made the statement that "Jews and muslims before 1948 always got along." You then moved to "The jews and muslims got along prior to 1948, it wasn't that bad. I'm not saying there wasn't issues. Of course there was, political ones." And now you settle on "you don't like to hear that arabs and jews ever got along". So which is it. Always? Only political issues? "Ever" got along? Why don't you figure out what you actually mean and try again. It's almost like you realize that your initial statement is laughably wrong so you are backpedaling and trying to reframe and recontextualize instead of simply admitting that you are wrong.Its almost as if you don't like to hear that arabs and jews ever got along, like its some sort of joke, never happened.
That's nice. You might also want to read up on Fatimid Al-Hakim and Muhammed Ibn Farkoh.Like they have been fighting since forever. Get real. They got along, they lived with each other, and even the omar the second muslim calph asked them the jews go with him when he took jerusalem. And many of them became muslims because of the hospitality of omar.
Again with this point. So what? None of the Palestinian leaders are from Palestine because it doesn't exist. What's your point? You keep wanting to talk about religion and peace but then you cite political leaders. You are very confused.You're deep in trying to make it harder than what it is. Most of Israels founders where not even from the middle east. Shimon peres is from where again ? Belarus ? Avigdor leiberman was russian ?
Ah, here it is. res ipsa loquitur.There are arabs that have more Semitic blood than these khazarian jews.
And the irony abounds. First you say that they aren't really Jews and then say that the excuse shouldn't be that they are not Jews.Jews have killed more people than you think. And don't give me that oh they're not really jews. YEAHHHH RIGHT.
Actually, he looks nothing like Netanyahu. Why does he matter to you? He has no relevance to this thread and your sad attempt to derail by posting his picture is indicative of how lost you are.Do you know this man ? He looks like benjamin nethanyau right ? hes not, that was gengrik yagoda, he was a russian jew, a Bolshevik. He killed more Christians than hitler killed jews and non-christians.
Be more specific. Maimonides worked for a Muslim king after escaping with his life from another group of Muslims called the Almohads who abolished the dhimmi status and forced anyone who wasn't Muslim to convert or exile.Maimonides was was a physician for an arab king for many years, and there was peace.
Fascinating. You made the statement that "Jews and muslims before 1948 always got along." You then moved to "The jews and muslims got along prior to 1948, it wasn't that bad. I'm not saying there wasn't issues. Of course there was, political ones." And now you settle on "you don't like to hear that arabs and jews ever got along". So which is it. Always? Only political issues? "Ever" got along? Why don't you figure out what you actually mean and try again. It's almost like you realize that your initial statement is laughably wrong so you are backpedaling and trying to reframe and recontextualize instead of simply admitting that you are wrong.
That's nice. You might also want to read up on Fatimid Al-Hakim and Muhammed Ibn Farkoh.
Again with this point. So what? None of the Palestinian leaders are from Palestine because it doesn't exist. What's your point? You keep wanting to talk about religion and peace but then you cite political leaders. You are very confused.
Ah, here it is. res ipsa loquitur.
And the irony abounds. First you say that they aren't really Jews and then say that the excuse shouldn't be that they are not Jews.
Actually, he looks nothing like Netanyahu. Why does he matter to you? He has no relevance to this thread and your sad attempt to derail by posting his picture is indicative of how lost you are.
Be more specific. Maimonides worked for a Muslim king after escaping with his life from another group of Muslims called the Almohads who abolished the dhimmi status and forced anyone who wasn't Muslim to convert or exile.
Yes, you are backpedaling, going from the absolute and blanket to the qualified statement. I don't recall saying anything other than that the claim you made about always getting along is wrong on its face. Show me that I said otherwise. I dare you. I have given quotes of what you have said but you haven't substantiated the claims you made.I'm not back pedaling anything. I'm saying jews and muslims did very well with each other, and not denying that there was tensions from tyrants and political movements. You on the other hand are making it sound like, noooo thats impossible. Its hilarious just reading your responses, I know israelis who would laugh at this statement.
Your argument was about Muslims and Jews. Now you want to deny any connection to someone because he is a particular type of Muslim and that doesn't count. Got it.ALSO, this al-hakim guy, is shia, im not a shia, shia are your brothers. You have alot in common with him than I do. The shia followers come from this man, here you can see for yourself, its published in a jewish encyclopedia.
Actually, in 1955 I believe that Abu Dis was under Jordanian control, so I guess he is Jordanian. There was no Palestine then either.Saeb erakat is a palestinian leader, and he was born in abu dis, palestine.
Agreed.right, they don't look like each other.
My point is not to say that all Muslims are bad. My point is to say that there have been good and bad Muslims and Muslim rulers. I can bring you plenty of other examples of persecution by Muslim towards Jews throughout the past 1,500 years, including exiles, exterminating the entire Jewish population of a town, etc. That doesn't mean that all Muslims persecuted Jews throughout history. It just means that being under Muslim dominance doesn't in any way ensure the safety of Jews.I don't know why they abolished it, I wasn't there, is the whole muslim world responsible for this ? Something happened, I dont know, they could be tyrants or follow a tyrant. Jews were their subjects and for some reason, they did this. Otherwise they did well around arabs and muslims.