But when you read things like 15% of the AZ state prison system is white supremist and Ásatrú/Odinism followers, it is still upsetting.
And I am about as far from the stereotype as you can get... Haha. I look more like an Italian Mobster .
So, what is up with the disparity then between folkish/non-folkish? It seems a lot of the negative stuff ends up along the lines of the Folkish side of the house. I didn't realize people cared that much about their ancestry to preclude another person from a religious path. I am still going to be utilizing the Norse Pantheon in my pursuits, of course, but I am unsure of how far down this path to walk.
The logic behind Folkish Polytheists (there are other ethnic movements besides the Germanic ones) is either that all peoples should only honor religiously their ancestors and the gods are apart of that ancestry because a) all gods and goddesses are ascended, human-born, divine ancestors who were chieftains the tribes and genetically are the forefathers of the ethno-linguistic group in question or b) created then interbred with the particular race in the Lore and all peoples are (as Stephen McNallen says) "metaphorically/literally" the children of their gods, carrying their blood.
This is a very culturally empowering argument but not a very spiritual one, as it IMO devalues the gods as human ancestral spirits as opposed to mighty deities who express themselves through Nature's glory, splendor, power and elegance.
This also, I feel, is a) not historical and b) illogical.
The gods may have been believed to be primal ancestors by some peoples (such as the goths) but they probably didn't believe them to be earth-born. Some cite Tacitus said that the teutons were a people who believed the chieftain god tuisto (mostly assumed to be Tyr) as their ancestor, (by his son and one of his three children, depending on the particular of the three tribes attested as "teutons") who was "deum... terra editum", translated as "a god... having been earth-born" which is semi-correct and misleading. "deus... terra editus" (deus in the nominative, with the adj editus in agreement) terra is probably ablative of means, not place-where, meaning it does not translate also as "a god having been born on the earth", rather "a god having been born by means of the earth". Since "Earth" as a goddess in and of herself is common to be the mother of the gods in Proto-Indo-European lore, and primary gods being human ascended ancestors is not common in Indo-European mythos (although some kings, warriors, shamans and heroes become local, minor deities like Hercules).
That is great info, thank you. Very glad you cleared that up. Looks like I need to look into either The Troth and other universalist side of the house, or possibly find out my actual genetic ancestry and see how much Germanic (if any) that I actually have , if I decide later to pursue Asatru.
Thanks again.
That is great info, thank you. Very glad you cleared that up. Looks like I need to look into either The Troth and other universalist side of the house, or possibly find out my actual genetic ancestry and see how much Germanic (if any) that I actually have , if I decide later to pursue Asatru.
Thanks again.