Wherenextcolumbus
Well-Known Member
So you do make conclusions on people knowing only one phrase the ever said.
Then again, it is a very common mistake.
No actually she is right he is an a***h*le
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So you do make conclusions on people knowing only one phrase the ever said.
Then again, it is a very common mistake.
No actually she is right he is an a***h*le
No actually she is right he is an a***h*le
So you do make conclusions on people knowing only one phrase the ever said.
Then again, it is a very common mistake.
Of course I don't.And that's not what I did here either.
Its funny how people have different views of what masculinity entails. There was this public figure in my country who once said that a real man knows how to cook and do dishes. And he was a professional boxer.Did anyone else even notice the gender role thing? The rape part was bad enough, but she seems to think there is going to be some mass confusion in bed if her husband changes a babies diaper or helps with the housework.
He was also, if I remember correctly, about as macho as they come, lol.Thats a good progressive look.
I definately agree. Unfortunately I am rather bad at taking care of myself, so for the sake of not feeling like a I am not a real man I am going to say you are too strict .The way I see it, a real man needs to know the same things a real womaneeds to know, which is to take care of himself and on some times of needs to take care of others.
That to me, is a real man and a real woman, and taking care means in all levels. The better you are able to take care of yourself and others in all levels, the more of a real man or real woman you are, on my book.
Rio de Janeiro (AFP) - In Brazil, the land of mini bikinis and voluptuous carnival dancers, most people say a woman who shows off her body deserves to be raped, according to a poll that has triggered outrage.
Of the 3,810 respondents of both sexes who responded to the government's Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA) survey released this week, about 2,480 -- 65 percent -- justified raping women who wear "clothing that shows off the body."
And 58.5 percent of respondents also agreed that "if women knew how to behave, there would be fewer rapes."
....................The excerpt that you read is from her husband Joe. Not the writer. He is advocating that if your spouse says "no", don't listen to them. Turn them around and rip their clothes off.................
Time to revive this thread with a news tidbit....
That human mind....always causing trouble.Friend Revoltingest,
There has been similar debates in India where rapes are occurring every 20 minutes [reported] and only a fraction of rapes gets reported.
Marital rape is not covered under present laws besides rape by elders in the family by friends, neighbours of children are hardly ever reported due to social stigma.
Though Brazilian survey reports what humans specially women feels themselves about Rape and wearing revealing clothes cause women can immediately sense what attention they are getting when they wear such clothes.
It is human mind that creates illusion that leads humans to act negatively and which can be rid off only when society as a whole leads a dharmic life towards betterment of humanity.
Love & rgds
Time to revive this thread with a news tidbit....
http://news.yahoo.com/brazilians-wo...-171003064.html;_ylt=AwrBEiH5_jZT410A5aTQtDMD
I don't know about you, but the way I dress, I won't be moving to Brazil.And apparently rape culture doesn't exist....
I don't know about you, but the way I dress, I won't be moving to Brazil.
I don't know about you, but the way I dress, I won't be moving to Brazil.
Time to revive this thread with a news tidbit....
http://news.yahoo.com/brazilians-wo...-171003064.html;_ylt=AwrBEiH5_jZT410A5aTQtDMD
Aw, now I'm blushing.Are you suggesting that you look provocatively gorgeous?