Would you mind expanding on the inconsistencies?
For me, the biggest inconsistency in the Bible isn't in the book itself.
Imagine you wanted to communicate a message to all of humanity. You have the ability to use any imaginable method to communicate this message. What method would you choose?
Option A: tell each person directly in their own language. Tailor what you say to each person so that it's accepted and understood.
Option B: tell a small group of people in one language. Ask them to tell everyone else, which they do (slowly and imperfectly) in a game of broken telephone over several thousand years involving varying interpretations and agendas, and imperfect translations to new languages.
No reasonably intelligent person, let alone a wise an all-knowing God, would pick Option B. This is especially true for miracle claims. I think it was Thomas Paine who pointed out that a miracle is only a miracle for the person who witnesses it directly; for everyone else, it's just hearsay.
No matter how I look at the Bible, I can't see it as consistent in any way with the idea that it's the product of a wise and powerful God who is interested in communicating a message to humanity. OTOH, I think it's entirely consistent with the idea that it's a human creation.