• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Recent Dalai Lama quote... thoughts?

ryanam

Member
All the world's major religions, with their emphasis on love, compassion, patience, tolerance, and forgiveness can and do promote inner values. But the reality of the world today is that grounding ethics in religion is no longer adequate. This is why I am increasingly convinced that the time has come to find a way of thinking about spirituality and ethics beyond religion altogether.

The moment we admit that questions of right and wrong, and good and evil, are actually questions about human and animal well-being, we see that science can, in principle, answer such questions. Human experience depends on everything that can influence states of the human brain, ranging from changes in our genome to changes in the global economy. The relevant details of genetics, neurobiology, psychology, sociology, economics etc. are fantastically complicated, but these are domains of facts, and they fall squarely within the purview of science.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
All the world's major religions, with their emphasis on love, compassion, patience, tolerance, and forgiveness can and do promote inner values. But the reality of the world today is that grounding ethics in religion is no longer adequate. This is why I am increasingly convinced that the time has come to find a way of thinking about spirituality and ethics beyond religion altogether.

The moment we admit that questions of right and wrong, and good and evil, are actually questions about human and animal well-being, we see that science can, in principle, answer such questions. Human experience depends on everything that can influence states of the human brain, ranging from changes in our genome to changes in the global economy. The relevant details of genetics, neurobiology, psychology, sociology, economics etc. are fantastically complicated, but these are domains of facts, and they fall squarely within the purview of science.
Is there a way of fruballing the Dalai Lama?

Also, is there a source?
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
I'm sure the Dalai Lama does, though.

Also, just thought I'd post the rest of what he says:

"We should reserve the notion of "morality" for the ways in which we can affect one another's experience for better or worse. Some people use the term "morality" differently, of course, but I think we have a scientific responsibility to focus the conversation so as to make it most useful. We define terms like "medicine," "causation," "law" and "theory" very much to the detriment of homeopathy, astrology, voodoo, Christian Science and other branches of human ignorance, and there is no question that we enjoy the same freedom when speaking about concepts like "right" and "wrong," and "good" and "evil." Once we acknowledge that "morality" relates to questions of human and animal well-being, then there is no reason to doubt that a prescriptive (rather than merely descriptive) science of morality is possible. After all, there are principles of biology, psychology, sociology and economics that will allow us to flourish in this world, and it is clearly possible for us not to flourish due to ignorance of these principles."

Awesome. I especially like "homeopathy, astrology, voodoo, Christian Science and other branches of human ignorance". Sick burn.
 
Last edited:

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
On the surface, at least, the Dalai Lama and Sam Harris have now made the same argument about putting morality on a scientific basis.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
On the surface, at least, the Dalai Lama and Sam Harris have now made the same argument about putting morality on a scientific basis.

No wonder the Dalai Lama sounds like Harris: The OP is quoting both the Dalai Lama and Harris.
 

Madhuri

RF Goddess
Staff member
Premium Member
What comes to mind, reading this, is that quote by Einstein:

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind"

I agree that religion alone is not adequate because religion alone is a dictation of what is right or wrong without critical examination. The sciences and philosophy allow the mind to understand why things are right and wrong and in my experience, has allowed me to understand the meaning in my religion much more fully.

I'd be interested in an elaboration of what he means by thinking about spirituality beyond religion.
 

Gjallarhorn

N'yog-Sothep
About time...maybe he will follow through with his "not going to reincarnate again" thing and allow Tibetan Buddhism to dissolve...
 
Top