cataway
Well-Known Member
prove a false belief ?I've yet to see anyone explain how it's an actual place, using actual New Testament Greek
Disappointing
-____-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
prove a false belief ?I've yet to see anyone explain how it's an actual place, using actual New Testament Greek
Disappointing
-____-
prove a false belief ?
its not an actual place, but it dose have meaning ,it just means complete destruction
fire destroys. the lake of fire destroys completely ..as in gone and gone for ever . not even remembered any moreNo, I think he's right.
The place is not a place but destruction (why fire is mentioned).
But what I quibble with is if there ever is such a thing as "complete destruction."
When you burn wood, there's ash.
When you burn oysters, you get lime.
When you melt metal, you get dross.
And so on. There's always some leftovers.
Romans 8:31-39 assures as that no force can separate us from God.
please dont confuse your self . there really is no fire , its symbolic of what fire does .This contradicts several other points, however.
There is something about this that is deeply wrong. But let's get to that.
- The immortality of the soul
- The notion that God is merciful and just
- The aforementioned statement that nothing can separate us from God
- The Biblical notions of what shame and sin really are
"But this is something you did! You were evil." Except in some cases, the only apparent evil was choosing the wrong religion. Would Gandhi, who relieved an entire country of suffering be condemned to this fate for not being a Christian? On the other end of the scale, what about cultist types that declare themselves Christian yet are Branch Davidian types? Clearly actions seem more important than faith, as we could not reconcile who people simply for belonging to a fangroup could turn out better than those who earnestly try to do good in the world.
But let's talk about the idea that it's actions, not faith that can save one. As in, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, all of them go to Heaven if they are good enough, and Hell otherwise. Putting aside that different religions have different ideas whether there even is afterlife instead of reincarnation or something, we have to ask... what's good enough? The Bible tells us in Romans 3:23 that all of us have failed and fallen short. If none of us are good enough to earn the seal of perfection from God, how then can any of us be so sinful that we cannot be forgiven? If God expects us to fail, then what can we do to disappoint him? The idea that there is something that you could do which could displease God to the point where he would never forgive you is wrong. In fact, it is the way of Satan, not God, that teaches there is such a thing as an irredeemable person.
How Satan Uses Shame Against You
Are You Unforgivable?
We're subsistence farmers. We know very well that fire does not destroy everything. We have wheat that we collected the wheat berries and tossed the chaff into the fireplace. When it is burned we will have ash. Ash will be used for soil. This soil will in turn grow new wheat.
Yes, everything about the original wheat is gone when the chaff is burned up. But this is never the of the story. I have to believe that God does want even the most sinful to redeem themselves. Even if they are punished and all they are is gone. Even if they have no memories. Even if they have to live a harsh existence to make their way back to God. God is not just someone who destroys evil people without any consideration. Humans do this sort of thing, squashing bugs, burning wood... Actually, that's a perfect analogy. There is wood we use for lumber, but also wood we use for burning. What evil did the burning wood do? It didn't. It's just most useful to be burned. But again, it doesn't just cease. Wood -> ash, which in turn has useful properties.
The thing is, these are new souls. The former (wicked) souls were turned into "ash" to "grow" new souls. What is true, is that all notion of (cataway, was it?) who is so wicked as to be burnt in the fire will be gone. There will be cataway soul ashes that God may use to make a person named Katarina. What isn't true is that there is no hope for the future. God remakes us all during our lives, and he will redeem (what's left of) us. But you are correct in saying that nothing recognizable will remain. This Katarina will not look like cataway, not act like cataway, and won't have any memories of cataway.
(This isn't reincarnation btw)
Hi, thank you for asking.Romans 8:31-39 assures as that no force can separate us from God.
But then Revelation talks about wicked people being tossed in a "lake of fire."
Hi, thank you for asking.
In my opinion, Romans was talking about repented Christians only.
While I'm not sure about the lake of fire, there will be some seperation between the saints and the rest, as I see it.
It's a matter of protecting the saints from further attacks from others, as I see it.
So I do think life is fair and just in the long run. So is God, in my opinion.
God doesn't love to see people suffering. God has pure love. Additionally, God does not play favorites.
please dont confuse your self . there really is no fire , its symbolic of what fire does .
Being close to God is hell if you don't want to be there.
OK, my bad.Buddhism is also going to be snuffed out. . i really dont see it making it to the lake of fire , a different fire ,yes a different fire makes that happen . yeah it should be gone long before the lake of fire happens .umm sorryYou just contradicted yourself.
Also...
Matthew 15:21-28 a woman comes to Jesus. She's not a Jew, she's not one of the chosen people. She's not a Christian either, if we extended this passage to modern times. She's a Canaanite. Basically someone from the Pre-Islamic pagan lands. Jesus tells her that his healing and his message (his salvation) are only for the children, and he's just an outsider. A dog. She is quick to point out that even dogs will take what crumbs they can get. The Pharisees thought this way, that there are worthy and unworthy. But I can't believe this is the way Heaven/Hell works.
Even symbolic fire has a symbolic purpose. Buddhism uses "snuffing" as a concept because they liken the process of burning to a fire being lighted and passed on. That is, everything about the old person is set on fire, and used to light a new flame. This is called rebirth rather than reincarnation, and is distinct because the reborn person is a different one. The old person who got things wrong is gone. Not saved.
Snuffing (nirvana) means you go out. The end of rebirth by stilling the fires that keep the process of rebirth going. That is, you stop burning up.
Now granted, this is a Buddhist syncretism (probably heresy), but the unclear nature of explanations of afterlife in either religion means we have idea whether this isn't the case. So that's my take. We are destroyed, and God uses our souls to create new things. New Heaven and Earth, new souls, and other new stuff.
I see... Scary.
Actually, I didn't contradict myself, cause anyone can repent. So, there is no favoritism. Entering heaven requires that you have repented of your sins. This is how I understand it.You just contradicted yourself.
Also...
Matthew 15:21-28 a woman comes to Jesus. She's not a Jew, she's not one of the chosen people. She's not a Christian either, if we extended this passage to modern times. She's a Canaanite. Basically someone from the Pre-Islamic pagan lands. Jesus tells her that his healing and his message (his salvation) are only for the children, and he's just an outsider. A dog. She is quick to point out that even dogs will take what crumbs they can get. The Pharisees thought this way, that there are worthy and unworthy. But I can't believe this is the way Heaven/Hell works.
OK, my bad.Buddhism is also going to be snuffed out. . i really dont see it making it to the lake of fire , a different fire ,yes a different fire makes that happen . yeah it should be gone long before the lake of fire happens .umm sorry
your thought's come from the here and now ? the way things are now.The analogy being that my religion being syncretic, I look at this other religion and the words from Christianity "God desires all to be saved." Even in an ideal world this can't happen. People are going to reject God. People are going to get stuck in cursed or wasted lifestyles. People are going to get trapped in rage or depression, and miss the goal of the kingdom. How then does this Christian concept of redemption work for those who are beyond hope, either because they don't love Jesus, or because they feel unlovable?
So then I looked at Revelation with its lake of fire, which just feels worse. But supposedly Revelation is declared to be a hopeful message. Sure, it's hopeful if you count yourselves as Christian. But what about someone who took the Mark because it was that or starve to death? The Bible says everyone who has it gets thrown into this lake of fire. If that's the end foe someone whose only crime is hunger and desperation, then there's something very wrong with this message of hope.
So then we have this message about a New Earth and a New Heaven. From the standpoint of the already saved, this doesn't really make any sense. The secular are typically angry at God, this is why they strive so hard to deny him, they cannot accept a world where God seems (I say seems, for believe in an afterlife) to have killed their dog, their father, or whatever without a second thought. For the saved, merely having Heaven would be enough, wouldn't it?
So then it gave me an idea that it's like those blind guys pawing at an elephant that these are religious fragments that sonehow fit together. Hindus and Buddhists believe that reality is cyclical, whereas Christians and Jews believe it has a beginning and an end. Suppose we're all right. That the universe has begun before, but maybe it wasn't as good. That universe might not have had Jesus so the Romans won. Why do we have this prophecy of end times? Because it played out this way, and alot of people were damned. But the New Heaven and New Earth is sort of like a harvest. They gather the souls that can be saved, they burn the chaff, and they prepare for another harvest.
Nirvana or moksha are the process of freeing oneself from the constant end of being burned. Most Buddhists think this burning fire of rebirth happens alot of times, but what if it really only happens once at the end of the age (each time)? Honestly we can't know, but I have to believe the reason it was phrased this way (rather than, "All righteous go to Heaven" it says "there will be a New Heaven and a New Earth") is that God does want for us to make it across that line. Again, I can't know this. But this is my hope for a better world. That God will completely and utterly destroy this one, because it sucks.