Rediscoveries of the Milky Way

[Native]

I asked you for a peer-reviewed paper, or at the least a report in a reputable journal of science, that affirms (or as the case may be) the claims in the video.

You apparently don't have one.

OK, but if you have bothered to open the video up on YouTube, you would have these relevant links:

Links:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s4155...
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10...
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ful...
Magnetism https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10...
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18659 https://www.aip.de/en/news/uralte-ste...
https://submissions.mirasmart.com/AAS...
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/articl...
https://greenbankobservatory.org/fron...

 

[blü 2]

OK, but if you have bothered to open the video up on YouTube, you would have these relevant links:

Links:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s4155...
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10...
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ful...
Magnetism https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10...
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18659 https://www.aip.de/en/news/uralte-ste...
https://submissions.mirasmart.com/AAS...
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/articl...
https://greenbankobservatory.org/fron...

The relevant links that I asked you for were from reputable scientific publications, not a whole barrage of Youtubeing.

So as it was in the beginning, I take it you have none.

That's fine/ Have a nice day.

 

[Native]

The relevant links that I asked you for were from reputable scientific publications, not a whole barrage of Youtubeing.

So as it was in the beginning, I take it you have none.

That just shows that you even didn´t look at the linked papers!

Don´t bother me anymore with your idle nonsense!

 

[Pogo]

That just shows that you even didn´t look at the linked papers!

Don´t bother me anymore with your idle nonsense!

that was a selection of research about the milky way, absolutely nothing mentioning or even vaguely supporting the assertions re mythology or ancient knowledge.

Yes don't bother us with your idle nonsense, Please.

 

[gnostic]

Sort of incorrect: Amun was always a supreme primordial air-god-entity in itself but was transformed in the creation stories from representing "air" to represent the "first fiery entity", which is logical as fire cannot burn without air/oxygen.

That false.

None of the paintings or basal sculpture reliefs of the Ogdoad at Khemenu (Hermopolis) during the Old Kingdom & Middle Kingdom periods, where all 8 deities appeared together, NOT ONE OF THEM, showed that Amun is superior than the others. Amun was no more supreme than his partner Amaunet, nor was he more supreme than Nu (or Nun), who appeared more frequently outside of Khemenu (eg Old Kingdom Pyramid Texts, Middle Kingdom Coffin Texts).

As I keep telling you, only from the New Kingdom period and Late Period, that Amun appeared as supreme deity, when he became more popular in Thebes, from 18th dynasty.

In the Late Period, things changed again, in Khemenu, where the ibis-headed Thoth was the supreme god, superior than the Ogdoad.