Anthem
Active Member
Why?That seems to be the official line, indeed.
Which only makes the actual text that more surprising and unconvincing, IMO.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why?That seems to be the official line, indeed.
Which only makes the actual text that more surprising and unconvincing, IMO.
Because it is so remarkably limited, even unbalanced, to say nothing about unenlightened.Why?
But Mohammad was chosen. Would an all knowing god choose a messanger that cant get the damn message right?
So you are questioning whether Mohammad was a messanger of god... and that is why he wrote a bad book with contradictions? Even thou the higest Islamic scholars can show you what it really is what you see as contradiction.I met many people claiming that God speaks through them; calling themselves chosen Messengers. Not all get the damn message right
I don't know Muhammad personally. Maybe He was an exception to the general rule "humans are not infallible"
Maybe they can, but one can't help but notice that they have had a very poor track record at actually doing it.So you are questioning whether Mohammad was a messanger of god... and that is why he wrote a bad book with contradictions? Even thou the higest Islamic scholars can show you what it really is what you see as contradiction.
Based on what?Maybe they can, but one can't help but notice that they have had a very poor track record at actually doing it.
I met many people claiming that God speaks through them; calling themselves chosen Messengers. Not all get the damn message right
I don't know Muhammad personally. Maybe He was an exception to the general rule "humans are not infallible"
Do you think the act of Muslims receiving refuge among non-Muslim is a disgrace for Muslims? When non-Muslims, even infidels, offer more kindness to needy Muslims than their brother Muslims doesn’t that say something?You misinterpret it wrong. No, it is not wrong of them to become refugees in christian countires...
No. That's kind of what I was saying.Do you think the act of Muslims receiving refuge among non-Muslim is a disgrace for Muslims?
When non-Muslims, even infidels, offer more kindness to needy Muslims than their brother Muslims doesn’t that say something?
I wish!Based on what?
They don't go around christian or jewish or whatever neighbourhoods correcting misunderstandings they have not made.
The main reason for all the anti islamic propaganda is that "ordinary" folk don't care to study before speaking so they repeat the first they have heard.
I don't understand your point there.I wish!
It is increasingly apparent that Islaam is actually protected by a good will, even from its critics, that it largely never deserved. For Islaam's reputation, ignorance is indeed bliss.
Up until a few years ago I assumed a lot about Islaam, perceiving it as not too different from Christianity, albeit with largely different language and concepts.I don't understand your point there.
So you are questioning whether Mohammad was a messanger of god... and that is why he wrote a bad book with contradictions? Even thou the higest Islamic scholars can show you what it really is what you see as contradiction.
In a similar vein, I met a man pacing up and down the street the other day waving his arm towards the sky and shouting, “I am God, I am God” repeatedly.
I said calm down mate, you will be arrested if you carry on, but he carried on so I offered to buy him a pint if he stopped.
He did, so we walked into the Pub and I said two pints please barman. The barman looked up, saw my companion and said “O God, not you again”.
The question is how to interpret them.No you misunderstood what I said. He was a great Messenger of God. But He was not God. God makes no mistakes, humans do.
As kids we "whispered a line of text in the ear of your neighbor ... after 8 times whisper ... original message was messed up". Just human error.
Koran verse 3:07 gives the solution for this "do not use these ambiguous verses, only use the literal ones".
The above verse is quite literal. And Muslims know this, that is why not one Muslim debated this verse.
The literal parts are:
"do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies"
"They are [in fact] allies of one another"
"And whoever is an ally to them among you - then indeed, he is [one] of them"
"Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people"
BTW, what you are describing in your first post is a modern form of Jihad.
Note that the word Islam means submission to god and that when the Quran speaks of it as the "right way" it doesn't really separate all other religions of itself.I like the video you included. Thank you.
I believe "peace" is only possible if religions stop believing "My religion is the only and best way to salvation"
When I was age 10 I knew this, and now 44 years later I still believe this is the major thing religions need to change
The question is how to interpret them.
Note that the word Islam means submission to god and that when the Quran speaks of it as the "right way" it doesn't really separate all other religions of itself.
So you think Muslims should exploit the generosity of the sucker infidels to the max.No. That's kind of what I was saying.