Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That is the sane thing to do, irrespective of the religion that one follows. We have this problem in India. The poor have more children than those who have money to care for them. So, my solution will be one child if one is not a tax payer. More permissible according to how much they pay to the government.For all the people who say “if you can’t afford to have a kid don’t have sex”…Do you think sex should be a class privilege??
For all the people who say “if you can’t afford to have a kid don’t have sex”…Do you think sex should be a class privilege??
I almost died from starvation as a kid. Poverty played a big role. That's a very privileged statement.It's all in the mind and not class
There are rich people who can't afford to have children.
And rich people who shouldn't have children.
Billionaires with no kids to leave their fortunes to lovemoney.com
It's all in the mind and not class.
You will need to explain this seemingly paradoxical statement sorry?
I imagine this is almost trivially true, but I'm not sure it addresses the thread OP?
I should rather they used it to help lift people out of poverty.
Well the notion of class is in the mind, it cannot be otherwise. Just because an idea is abstract and not real, doesn't mean it can't have real consequences.
I don't think one should take sex for granted.For all the people who say “if you can’t afford to have a kid don’t have sex”…Do you think sex should be a class privilege??
I do not know what you are trying to say, or how it relates.I don't think one should take sex for granted.
It means, no matter if one are rich or poor sex is not someone one just get because one want it so one can't take it for grantedI do not know what you are trying to say, or how it relates.
Are you just saying that sex is not available just because one wants to have sex? I don't think any one would argue with that.It means, no matter if one are rich or poor sex is not someone one just get because one want it so one can't take it for granted
No it can be in a relationship tooAre you just saying that sex is not available just because one wants to have sex? I don't think any one would argue with that.
I was including relationships. Just because one is in a relationship does not mean that sex is available just because one wants it. One's partner or partners may not be in the mood.No it can be in a relationship too
Whatever.There are rich people who can't afford to have children.
That is VERY different than being able to afford one.There are rich people who say "I can't have children because it will interrupt where I want to be, what I do, and I don't want to be burdened by raising a child. I can't have a child because of it diverting my goals"
As I said, I could not "afford" to have children but managed to birth three and we are alive and kicking.That is VERY different than being able to afford one.
Again. My parents had 4. They could not afford it. And I went 2 weeks without food at one point. In some cases it is about whether you can afford kids and not do you desire kidsAs I said, I could not "afford" to have children but managed to birth three and we are alive and kicking.
Maybe it is more about no desire than capacity or selfishness than affordability?
Again. My parents had 4. They could not afford it. And I went 2 weeks without food at one point. In some cases it is about whether you can afford kids and not do you desire kids