Marisa
Well-Known Member
I can't imagine it either. I wonder if anyone can? LOLI think it comes from not being able to imagine non-existence. I don't see much sense in being afraid of it but I still find it very frightening.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I can't imagine it either. I wonder if anyone can? LOLI think it comes from not being able to imagine non-existence. I don't see much sense in being afraid of it but I still find it very frightening.
Actualy, yeah. Many ethnic religions (or folk) see death as a psrt of life so the fear isnt the unknown or afterlife but how one dies to get there.
At any rate, I'm with Twain on this one:
I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it. Mark Twain
You mean these religions assume an afterlife but worry about the transition?
I can't imagine it either. I wonder if anyone can? LOL
Okay my first thread! Well besides my intro!
One of the things I really like about Epicurean philosophy is freedom from fear of death via Epicurus's understanding of the nature of life and death.
It occurred to me that perhaps without afterlife concepts being introduced at a young age, fear of death wouldn't be introduced because there would be nothing good or bad associated with death.
Do you think this is accurate or do you disagree?
That sounds like a belief in an afterlife to me.No. Buddhism does not have any. My 'Advaita' Hindu belief also does not have the concept of rebirth because I am born from the whole and return to the whole.
I doubt the common fear of death is casually based on the teaching of an afterlife.Okay my first thread! Well besides my intro!
One of the things I really like about Epicurean philosophy is freedom from fear of death via Epicurus's understanding of the nature of life and death.
It occurred to me that perhaps without afterlife concepts being introduced at a young age, fear of death wouldn't be introduced because there would be nothing good or bad associated with death.
Do you think this is accurate or do you disagree?
That sounds like a belief in an afterlife to me.Unless your conception of moksha or returning to the whole is identical to oblivion or complete nonexistence of consciousness. Most advaita hindus I see refer to moksha as bliss, consciousness oneness, or something along those terms. That would be an afterlife.
It is neither oblivion nor nonexistence. I am what exists in the universe, Brahman, and no other thing exists. My body arose from a billion things, the DNA contributed by my parents, air, water, food. Do not go on form. Through the last 13.75 billion years, what constitutes me has taken various forms. On what is termed as my death, my body will be cremated. It will turn into 1. Water vapor, 2. Carbon-di-oxide and 3. Lime. That will take care of perhaps 95% of what constitutes me. These will go in to a billion things. This cycle continues. If other religions or sects of Hinduism make a simple thing complex (that is natural because I am an atheist Hindu), it is their problem. My theory is the grand redux.That sounds like a belief in an afterlife to me. Unless your conception of moksha or returning to the whole is identical to oblivion or complete nonexistence of consciousness. Most advaita hindus I see refer to moksha as bliss, consciousness oneness, or something along those terms. That would be an afterlife.
Each wave appears to have a birth, short life and death. From a limited perspective this is a reasonable way to think about it. Taking a larger perspective, each wave is just another face of an unchanging ocean.
Each way of looking at the wave is valid.
I specified oblivion or nonexistence of consciousness.It is neither oblivion nor nonexistence.
If you do not believe consciousness continues in some form, including no belief in the consciousness becoming some larger whole, and merely believe that your matter disperses back into nature, then that indeed seems like no belief in an afterlife, which would differ from the majority of Buddhists and Hindus.I am what exists in the universe, Brahman, and no other thing exists. My body arose from a billion things, the DNA contributed by my parents, air, water, food. Do not go on form. Through the last 13.75 billion years, what constitutes me has taken various forms. On what is termed as my death, my body will be cremated. It will turn into 1. Water vapor, 2. Carbon-di-oxide and 3. Lime. That will take care of perhaps 95% of what constitutes me. These will go in to a billion things. This cycle continues. If other religions or sects of Hinduism make a simple thing complex (that is natural because I am an atheist Hindu), it is their problem. My theory is the grand redux.
I live by the sea and like watching waves, and I agree they are an interesting analogy. But taking your larger perspective, what does the ocean represent?