BruceDLimber
Well-Known Member
Hi!
I second Booko's remarks.
Regards,
Bruce
I second Booko's remarks.
Regards,
Bruce
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sunstone said:I hate to challenge this because I wish it were true. But perhaps we shouldn't think that religion prevents us from putting our knowledge to destructive uses. For instance:
How did Christianity prevent . . .?
How did Judaism prevent . . .?
How did Islam prevent . . .?
How did Hinduism prevent . . .?
zoro said:Well, two obvious options are: 1) dream up some myth about how the universe was created (such as all the myths in all the "holy books"), or 2) apply the scientific method to learn as much as one can.
Well, it depends on what you mean by "great power". For me, the sunrise "tells" me the scattering of light varies inversely with the fourth power of the wave length and therefore red light is scattered less than blue (demonstrating the "great power" of Maxwell's equations of electrodynamics); the beauty of some flowers "tells" me that natural selection stimulated the flower's DNA molecule to present an appearance especially attractive to pollinating insects (and therefore, the "great power" of evolution); and when it comes to the beauty and perfection of my grandchildren, it "tells" me of the "great power" of personal bias.
Go easy! "Just to live for a while" is a very significant purpose!
The DNA molecule "learned" (by natural selection) that its temporary hosts are rather insignificant.
-- rather than consider themselves so important that the imagined creator of the universe, HIMself, is passionately interested in them! As someone else said, such religious nonsense is egotism gone beserk.
Well, rather than laugh more, you may wish to investigate what is meant by "behavioral sciences" (anthropology, biology, criminology, ecology, economics, psychology, psychiatry, political science, social science,....)
Well, actually, I doubt very much that I wrote that. Instead (as I demonstrate in my free, online book at www.zenofzero.net), I estimate the probability of any god to be very much less than 1 chance in a google (i.e., less than one chance in 10^100 -- and probably closer to one chance in 10^500).
-- were it not for the terrible harm that all organized religions have done (and continue to do) to humanity, and therefore, the great need to eradicate all of them.
....science is the religion of adults."
But otherwise, if you'll look into the principal "holy books", you'll see that they're loaded with threats, stimulating fear (e.g., of "eternal punishment").
Although data are available to support your assessment, yet on the one hand, it's a pity that you've been conditioned to accept that life is like studying for an exam (recall: "life isn't a problem to solve -- but a happening, to experience")
and on the other hand, what I hope for you is that someday, soon, you will choose to study for 10 or 12 hours per day not because you're worried about an exam or threatened in some other manner, but because you want to learn.
I hope that, on your own, you'll soon be able to find a better way to live what all evidence suggests is this sole opportunity that you'll have to experience your existence.
But simultaneously I'd urge you not to worry about your own death (although do try to postpone it as long as possible!), for as I wrote in one of the poems in my book, "you can't be aware of a lack of awareness."
As a single example from a selection of thousands (if not millions), dolphins swim underneath their wounded cousins, lifting them to the surface periodically, so they can breathe.
thus by nature and by nurture, we acquire such "moral codes" --
That's a simple question to answer: not only because I haven't seen even the tiniest shred of data to support such silly speculations
--rather than having created itself via a symmetry-breaking fluctuations in a total void. As I show in my book, the scientific support for the second alternative is quite compelling.
[And as a postscript, perhaps I should mention that I do entertain the possibility that you live in a Muslim family (and/or a Muslim country) and therefore you possibly feel it to be necessary to write what you did (for fear of the con-artist clerics demanding that you be killed as an apostate, i.e., one who could potentially ruin their con game). If so, best wishes in your struggles to remain true to yourself.]
yes of course , life is the biggest exam itself , but unlike any other exam , if we failed ,there is no second chance to make up for the failure
I love the thinking that one who rejects the teaching of religion is considered to be the arrogant pup. To my thinking it is those who stand on the words of others, without thinking an original thought of their own, that display arrogance.maro said:what about about these two options: 1)accept the messege from the creator,and follow the prophets 2)reject it, out of arrogance and denial
Um, incorrect. My first thought would be "Wow, nice work! I wonder how the artist did that." I don't think I have ever looked at a work of art and wondered who the artist was. That always comes later, for me at least.maro said:in real life, if you saw a beautiful painting, the first thing that will come to your mind is, who painted it ?
Probably that the alleged artist is very talented, lol and has a beautiful grasp of reality dovetailed with the ability to express that grasp. But hey, that's just me. The picture or statue or whatever would in fact tell me NOTHING about the person who created it, other than the fact that they have a distinct ability to create something that makes me go, "Wow". I don't know their politics. I don't know what they like for dessert. I don't know their sexual preference. I don't know much about the artist at all, and it is ludicrous to assume much about the person from their work aside from they are a talented artist.maro said:and if some one asked you isn't the beauty of this picture telling you something about the the one who painted it, what will be your answer ?
maro said:yes it tells me that he is a great artist who deserves respect or
A flowery attempt to instill meaning where there is none. What you are describing is purely subjective. Some people think Jackson Pollock is a genius, whereas I would disagree.maro said:the picture was just made by itself, and its beauty tells me how the green colour is in harmony with the yellow for example, and how natural selection, cared about the details of the extremely perfect picture
So, in effect, without religious values, life has no meaning. Is that what you are saying? If so, it would by default lend support to the misguided notion of killing the non-believer as their life, comparatively speaking, has no meaning as they have no religious values.maro said:i dare to disagree, if i was living just to live, and then die, it doesn't worth it
maro said:yes,you are right,this is what the religion teaches us, that we are so important that the creator himself ( who created us,by the way )is interested in us
To me, and perhaps any rational thinker, this exhibits a total arrogance on the part of the human animal. We are indeed animals and I need only turn on the evening news to confirm this premise. I agree with Zoro on this one, this is nothing more than pure and total egotism, gone berserk. When man sets himself up as the arbiter of all on the planet then he is in need of a reality check.maro said:religion is honouring Man he is not just a monkey, which (by evolution and natural selection ) became a man why haven't the other animals developed by natural selection, why are they still animals !!
maro said:with all respect to your behavioural sciences, but they existed long time ago, and they haven't did any good to humanity
Come again? I notice you state "your behavioral sciences" which would indicate that you do not support the findings of those schools of thought. A mere self-described "student" is pooh-poohing such honored disciples as Zoro indicated above. That is rather breathtaking.maro said:on the contrary, the more time passes, we turn from bad to worse and from one war to another
Ahhh, the "big stick" approach of religion. Could it be that those who suffer from religious zeal are the ones with the "huge blind spot, who keep explaining everything in a funny way that fits with their denial" of reality? What will be your fate if you are the one who is wrong? Will you not have wasted your entire life following an illusion only to end up feeling a bit foolish in the end? What if your particular book is wrong? We'll see who has the last laugh.maro said:and if this probability of your own, was the only clear truth,that every thing in the universe is telling us about, and you was the one with the huge blind spot, who keep explaining everything in a funny way that fits with your denial to god, what will be your fate ?
Absolute statements tend to show one thing and one thing only and that is that they are wrong. The only beam of light? If it weren't for so many people doing "god's will" I rather suspect that we would be a lot better off. So far, they have not managed to solve virtually ANY of man's problems. If anything man's foolish religions seem to simply rub salt in his own self-created wounds.maro said:you think religions did harm to humanity? No, religion is the only beam of light that can lighten our lives,and keep humanity from all the suffering it is going through it is not religion which did the harm, it is keeping away from religion
So, science bad... religion good? Oddly your own prophet enjoined his followers to seek knowledge but then again that knowledge is not to conflict with his "revealed" words, so one can only wonder how useful such seeking could be. I don't believe he said "self-serving" knowledge.maro said:good luck with your religion,then
Sadly, the words about Hellfire and fearing a wrathful god do not have ANY impact on this small mortal. In fact, they take away from the good stuff that is described and make me wonder how realistic the promises are to begin with. In effect, it was a pretty sad marketing concept that may have worked 1400 years ago and for less intelligent people even now, but some of us are not swayed by such trifles.maro said:yes you are right, the quran for example has many threats that stimulates fear, and many promises that stimulates hope as well, that's why it's God's mercy to man kind
Frankly speaking, if following the words of "the messenger" are required to gain access to "paradise" then I am, for one, not interested in being with such people.maro said:yes of course, life is the biggest exam itself, but unlike any other exam, if we failed,there is no second chance to make up for the failure
You cannot "take" the idea that you might be wrong; it is therefore not a huge surprise that you stay with a belief system that is so binding and clear cut. If only reality was so cut and dried -- or so black and white.maro said:i do like to learn, but some times i don't ... (because i can't take failure )
How odd it is that such a noble being that is so much better than mere animals requires a rule book. Doesn't that seem strange to you?maro said:that's why god hasn't send any books or prophets to dolphins or any other animals, because we are the only one who need guidance.
The simple fact is that things are getting better with each moment that passes. Perhaps you are just fixated on the negatives in life.maro said:don't you think that all this mess need to be corrected,
maro said:we are living in a universe were everything is going straight, the sun rotates in its orbit, so do the electrons of the atom, we are the only mess here,
The only "mess" resides in the minds of some people... ok... many people, as they prefer to live in a pretend reality instead of the real world. Aside from that if indeed we live in such a perfect universe, other than man of course, that would seem to indicate that we too are working perfectly...maro said:that's why the day will come to correct this mess
So you desperately hope for the destruction of all that is not of your faith. Now that is cheery thinking. You prefer to allow god to come and clean up our mess, to reward the righteous and to consign the vile to the pits of the Hellfire? Is this supposed to be a helpful outlook? I'm dying to hear. Honest.maro said:you know what i wish ? i wish to see you in the judgment day, and ask you if you still think the universe created itself or not, it's my sincere wish, really
MysticSang'ha said:To paraphrase the Dalai Lama - If science ever proves something wrong from the Dharma (such as reincarnation/rebirth), then we must throw out that doctrine. Buddhism is based on reality.
i believe that i am a slave of god , who has to submit to him , and that i am made of clay , and i am going back to it ,YmirGF said:I love the thinking that one who rejects the teaching of religion is considered to be the arrogant pup
so , logically there must be an artist , it can't be made by itself ,Um, incorrect. My first thought would be "Wow, nice work! I wonder how the artist did that." I don't think I have ever looked at a work of art and wondered who the artist was. That always comes later, for me at least.
without my religious values , life will have no meaning to meSo, in effect, without religious values, life has no meaning. Is that what you are saying? If so, it would by default lend support to the misguided notion of killing the non-believer as their life, comparatively speaking, has no meaning as they have no religious values.
lol ! because we are superior to the animal kingdom , we are the kings of this planet , and no animal (no matter how much it developed) can never compete with us , don't you think ?Why do we need to puff ourselves up in some deluded sense of moral superiority to the animal kingdom?
did i said there is nothing of any value in them , in my op i said (science is the enemy of superstion , and the most intimate friend to religion ) , remember ?So there is nothing of any value in modern psychology? Nothing to Criminology? Zippo from the Social sciences? Anthropology? Biology? Ecology? Economics? Psychiatry? Political science. Or perhaps, are the only things of value items that do not disagree with the preconceived prejudices of man's religions?
We'll see who has the last laugh.
no, there aren't so many people doing god's will ,If it weren't for so many people doing "god's will" I rather suspect that we would be a lot better off. So far, they have not managed to solve virtually ANY of man's problems.
So, science bad... religion good? Oddly your own prophet enjoined his followers to seek knowledge but then again that knowledge is not to conflict with his "revealed" words, so one can only wonder how useful such seeking could be. I don't believe he said "self-serving" knowledge.
In effect, it was a pretty sad marketing concept that may have worked 1400 years ago and for less intelligent people even now, but some of us are not swayed by such trifles.
How odd it is that such a noble being that is so much better than mere animals requires a rule book. Doesn't that seem strange to you?
The simple fact is that things are getting better with each moment that passes. Perhaps you are just fixated on the negatives in life.
Aside from that if indeedwe live in such a perfect universe, other than man of course, that would seem to indicate that we too are working perfectly...
So you desperately hope for the destruction of all that is not of your faith. Now that is cheery thinking. You prefer to allow god to come and clean up our mess, to reward the righteous and to consign the vile to the pits of the Hellfire? Is this supposed to be a helpful outlook? I'm dying to hear. Honest.
PolyHedral said:Is Allah omnipotent? Because if he is, there's no point in a test, because he already knows the results.
Pardus said:Science doesn't like or dislike religions, it's the religions who have the preferences.
XAAX said:Science and Religion are 2 sides to the same coin. Just 2 different perspectives...science and religion both should strengthen your understanding for God and the Universe...For they are One
love said:Science, or the study of physical nature has not changed or added to one law of nature that did not exist from the beginning.
I think that man's "religion" has at times been a hinderance to mans advancement in his knowledge of nature.
When the religious leaders of Europe ruled they were in the "Dark Ages" while the Muslims were making tremendous advances in medicine, algerbra, and science.
It seems that today in countries where the religious leaders rule and try to control thought there is very little advancement made. .