I get more comfort being true to what I actually believe than pretending I'm something I'm not.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I get more comfort being true to what I actually believe than pretending I'm something I'm not.
Atheism doesn't benefit anything. In my case, it's simply just waiting to believe in a god until I have enough evidence. I haven't seen any evidence convincing enough, so until I do, I'm still an atheist.
I do not see the evidence as compelling. Just like any other theistic belief.If to choose on the basis of the following observation, then it is evidence for Theism, rather than Atheism.
Fact: the existence of Jews, Holy Land, and Jerusalem.
Evidence is not rigorous proof, but it increases the chances for Christianity to be correct.
The existence of Biblical Jews does not speak for Atheism.
But there is evidence. Evidence for theism is there. It is Jerusalem and his Jews. That is why Adolf Hitler was "cleansing" this living evidence from the face of the Earth.I do not see the evidence as compelling. Just like any other theistic belief.
Lots of different religious groups were targeted. That doesn't mean they were correct. There are pagan groups older than Judaism who were almost wiped out by Abrahamics. But they endured.But there is evidence. Evidence for theism is there. It is Jerusalem and his Jews. That is why Adolf Hitler was "cleansing" this living evidence from the face of the Earth.
Please understand: evidence is not proof. The evidence speaks for. Jews speak for God.Lots of different religious groups were targeted. That doesn't mean they were correct. There are pagan groups older than Judaism who were almost wiped out by Abrahamics. But they endured.
Hence why I said the evidence is not compelling to me.Please understand: evidence is not proof. The evidence speaks for. Jews speak for God.
If to choose on the basis of the following observation, then it is evidence for Theism, rather than Atheism.
Fact: the existence of Jews, Holy Land, and Jerusalem.
Evidence is not rigorous proof, but it increases the chances for Christianity to be correct.
The existence of Biblical Jews does not speak for Atheism.
Why does a people group existing point to a god also existing?
Hence why I said the evidence is not compelling to me.
It is logic: no theists means, no God.
existence of theists means, that God is at least probable.
If to choose on the basis of the following observation, then it is evidence for Theism, rather than Atheism.
Fact: the existence of Jews, Holy Land, and Jerusalem.
Evidence is not rigorous proof, but it increases the chances for Christianity to be correct.
The existence of Biblical Jews does not speak for Atheism.
YES. Or do you have a scientific disproof of that idea?Vampire myths exist in every culture around the world. Does that also make vampires probable?
Do not be another Einstein. Be as simple as a fisherman, e.g. apostle Peter. You have Christianity vs. Atheism. Let us consider only two subjects. Not pantheism+Christ+Atheism, but only Christianity vs Atheism.A mere shared belief is not evidence unless all conflicting beliefs on the subject can be satisfactorily reconciled. What was the basis for those earliest beliefs. Why have these types of beliefs changes over the millennia?
These questions must be answered first before any claim of evidence.
YES. Or do you have a scientific disproof of that idea?
Google: mother of all bombs.Truth is not always comfortable, but it is more comforting than lies.
I am thankful to scientists for the many advances that have prolonged and increased the quality of our lives - for the real, tangible, true things they have contributed to the entire world.
The soul is connected to the body. Can you move your tale? No. Thus, no animal soul there.It's not my job to disprove a myth... It's the person who tells me the myth is real that has to prove it.
Otherwise, everything is to be taken at face value as real, cause it can't be disproven.
Did you know that I have the soul of a wolf, and not a human? Can you prove that I don't?
Do you agree? It seems, that atheism does not benefit the ability to be reasonable:
What Atheist Steven Hawking Has Discovered at All, if Black Holes Do Not Evaporate?, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2012.0054
Then Jesus said, “Come to me, all of you who are weary and carry heavy burdens, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you. Let me teach you, because I am humble and gentle at heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
Matthew 11:28-29
If to choose on the basis of the following observation, then it is evidence for Theism, rather than Atheism.
Fact: the existence of Jews, Holy Land, and Jerusalem.
Evidence is not rigorous proof, but it increases the chances for Christianity to be correct.
The existence of Biblical Jews does not speak for Atheism.
But there is evidence. Evidence for theism is there. It is Jerusalem and his Jews. That is why Adolf Hitler was "cleansing" this living evidence from the face of the Earth.
Please understand: evidence is not proof. The evidence speaks for. Jews speak for God.
It is logic: no theists means, no God.
existence of theists means, that God is at least probable. The existence of theists does not speak for atheism.
But it is evidence. Atheists say, that there is no single evidence for God, they are wrong.
Do not be another Einstein. Be as simple as a fisherman, e.g. apostle Peter. You have Christianity vs. Atheism. Let us consider only two subjects. Not pantheism+Christ+Atheism, but only Christianity vs Atheism.
A piece of evidence is a fact, which speaks for. The existence of Jews speaks rather for Christianity than Atheism.
Do not be another Einstein. Be as simple as a fisherman, e.g. apostle Peter. You have Christianity vs. Atheism. Let us consider only two subjects. Not pantheism+Christ+Atheism, but only Christianity vs Atheism.
A piece of evidence is a fact, which speaks for. The existence of Jews speaks rather for Christianity than Atheism.
Do not be another Einstein. Be as simple as a fisherman, e.g. apostle Peter. You have Christianity vs. Atheism. Let us consider only two subjects. Not pantheism+Christ+Atheism, but only Christianity vs Atheism.
A piece of evidence is a fact, which speaks for. The existence of Jews speaks rather for Christianity than Atheism.
The soul is connected to the body. Can you move your tale? No. Thus, no animal soul there.