Haha, you have once again proved you do not understand climate science, the more you open your mouth the deeper the hole you dig.
You did not answer my question and instead rambled on incoherently about stuff you do not understand.
??????? You're not making the slightest bit of sense. You asked for data showing that natural causes for global warming haven't increased. I provided the data that shows solar output hasn't increased nor is there any indication of orbital changes that would account for the current warming trend.
How does that not answer your question?
Fyi, the satellite UAH and RSS data is not a measure of solar forcing, it is a measure of upper atmosphere temperature, big difference...look it up?
Again, try and keep up. I posted links to
multiple data sets. The first was to the National Solar Radiation Database, which (as I described) is a long term data set of the amount of solar energy coming to the earth from the sun. It shows no increase. I also linked to the satellite data of temperatures in different layers of the atmosphere, and described how if the current warming trend was due to an increase in solar activity, we would expect to see warming in
all atmospheric layers, but instead we actually see cooling in the upper layers while surface temps continue to rise. That's entirely consistent with an increasing greenhouse effect, which when coupled with the data showing how human activity has caused a large increase in greenhouse gasses, is exactly what is expected under human-caused global warming.
Now I will repeat my question and I request that you address it, and not misdirect as is your recent form.
Again, try and keep up.
For your claim to be true that the global warming since 1950 is 100% due to human causes, it follows logically that the natural causes during this period have not increased since that 1950, for if they did, it proves humans are not 100% responsible. Here is a graph of temperature changes prior to 1950 when human causes were minimal, note that the changes you see are practically 100% naturally caused, and you imply these suddenly stopped in 1950, and since then all changes are 100% human caused?
One more time....
The data Debatable posted shows that there was an increase in solar energy reaching the earth prior to 1950, which would explain at least some, maybe all, of the warming that took place during that period. But the same data also shows that this increase in solar output stopped around 1950 and has not increased since. Yet average global temperatures continue to rise. Why? As explained above, it can't be because of the sun or orbital changes. So what's driving it?
We know that the upper atmosphere is cooling while the surface is warming, which is indicative of an increasing greenhouse effect. Now what would drive that? Gosh......do you think that just maybe it has something to do with all the metric tons of greenhouse gasses we've been pumping into the atmosphere?
Come on.....try and keep up this time.