Buddha Dharma
Dharma Practitioner
I agree, but I think people can be "meditative" without actually doing mediation
That's Epicurean meditation
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I agree, but I think people can be "meditative" without actually doing mediation
I would strongly question the premise that Buddhism doesn't require belief in god. As a very traditional Buddhist, I believe the Buddha when he says he talked to Brahma and others, and he had the awakened eye of Anutara Samyak Sambodhi. It comes close to questioning the Blessed One's judgment when a Buddhist denies there are gods in the cosmos. They say the Tathagata was wrong.
Was the Blessed One mistaken when he spoke of the gods, their karmic effects on the cosmos, and said some of them took refuge in the Triple Gem? What else can we speculate the Buddha was wrong about? What parts of the Dharma are we going to pick out to believe, because we want to be skeptics- thinking our ego sense knows better? What parts of the sublime Dharma are we going to discard?
Buddhism means having faith in the Buddha. That his words and teachings are true. Several monks throughout history have said a Buddhist without faith in the Buddha's full teaching are defaming the Triple Gem.
The issue is whether 'belief in God' is necessarily involved here concerning the effects of deep meditation on the brain. The answer is no the research only addressed those who practice deep meditation and prayer, and not whether they believed in God
Oh, I never heard of that...That's Epicurean meditation
Oh, I never heard of that...
Okay, thanks for explaining that.According to Neo-Epicurean Haris Dimitriadis, spontaneous meditative states are essential to generating or prolonging Ataraxia (Epicurean pleasure).
He defines this as allowing oneself to at times fix their attention on an object or point somewhere in the background and ride the pleasure of the conceptual mind temporarily interrupted. He doesn't consider this seeking meditation out, because it's like giving into a daydream impulse.
Yes, that is what I meant.I think mindful acting could also be meditativeness, as you called it.
The activity in the frontal lobe of the baseline brain appears to curve to the right, while in the meditation brain, it curves to the left. Could this have political implications?
I'm not a believer in neurotheology, but I would think that there is more activity and awareness in the religious brain, especially the frontal lobes, versus that of an atheist brain. This isn't to say that atheists are dull thinkers, but that they do not experience the full sense of consciousness or awareness of that of a religious person. The atheists are in a state of continual dissatisfaction and pain. Through prayer, chanting and meditation, the religious are able to tap into their neurological selves better in order to better achieve a closer to Nirvana or enlightenment state. In this sense, I am for the better enlightenment of all here.
Neurotheology: This Is Your Brain On Religion
Since Buddhism doesn't require a belief in God and these studies were done on Buddhists, I don't why atheism is referenced in the OP.
Meditation is meditation. Theism is not required to meditate.
Otherwise I'm comfortable with the idea that meditation improves one's mental state.
SECULAR MEDITATION
Any analysis that confuses theism with religiosity is doomed to confuse itself out of any useful conclusions.I'm not a believer in neurotheology, but I would think that there is more activity and awareness in the religious brain, especially the frontal lobes, versus that of an atheist brain. This isn't to say that atheists are dull thinkers, but that they do not experience the full sense of consciousness or awareness of that of a religious person. The atheists are in a state of continual dissatisfaction and pain. Through prayer, chanting and meditation, the religious are able to tap into their neurological selves better in order to better achieve a closer to Nirvana or enlightenment state. In this sense, I am for the better enlightenment of all here.
Neurotheology: This Is Your Brain On Religion
Yeah, religious folks that don't meditate don't have an advantage and atheists who do meditate have that advantage.I see this more as the meditative brain versus the baseline brain (more than atheist versus religious).
I think Meditation is so good for us and I am still too lazy to do it
I see this more as the meditative brain versus the baseline brain (more than atheist versus religious).
I think Meditation is so good for us and I am still too lazy to do it
I've definitely noted neurological activity and shifting that takes place during meditation. Sometimes you experience a sensation of nerves bulging in the head, and Alan Watts described it in a similar way. That is, something is happening to your brain. I've always noticed it when the brain is being pulled back and quieted through breathing. The mind doesn't like to be quiet, and left to it's own devices- it may not even know how.
Yes, I agree there's nothing here about religion vs atheism. It's about what happens in meditation which can be done by believer and non-believer alike.
It's about meditating about God with the religious.
I would think the baseline is the "atheist" brain else it would be the religious brain.
Prayer at it's best can be compared to meditation, but pure meditation is better if you can do it.It's about meditating about God with the religious. Our prayers are like meditating when one does it over and over. Group chanting seems to have an effect, too. Group chanting/prayer leads to a reverent frame of mind.
EDIT: Meditation is like soaring by one's own powers vs being strapped to a rocket. One has a different feeling doing by themselves versus having a machine do it for them.
Buddhists don't necessarily believe in god(s)
Your picture is of that. Buddhists don't necessarily believe in god(s) and the ones that do might believe in a different one than another. You're just trying to use this as an attack against atheism, but Buddhism is atheistic by itself.