Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
is it hypocritical to advocate for killing a conscious being that is viable and be upset over the termination of a fetus who is neither fully conscious or viable?
Maybe, maybe not.
I assume that the justification for capital punishment is that the individual put to death deserves it as the result of his/her legal/moral transgressions.
But a new person who hasn't even entered the world yet can be guilty of no similar transgressions.
Yeah, that's the usual excuse. But those people shouldn't call themselves "pro life" because they aren't.Maybe, maybe not.
I assume that the justification for capital punishment is that the individual put to death deserves it as the result of his/her legal/moral transgressions.
But a new person who hasn't even entered the world yet can be guilty of no similar transgressions.
Yes, and put advocating guns in that equation.is it hypocritical to advocate for killing a conscious being that is viable and be upset over the termination of a fetus who is neither fully conscious or viable?
is it hypocritical to advocate for killing a conscious being that is viable and be upset over the termination of a fetus who is neither fully conscious or viable?
All I can say isIn MI, we're seeing a fundie candidate who
wants to make even contraception illegal.
She even hints at banning sex outside of
marriage between a man & a woman.
Of course....Trump backs her.
This Trump-Backed Candidate Wants to Ban Birth Control
Support Jacky now!
Yet another example of how if we assume that the anti-choice movement is based on a concern for (what they consider to be) human life, it often makes no sense at all, but if we assume it's based on a desire to punish women for having sex they disapprove of, the movement is entirely consistent.is it hypocritical to advocate for killing a conscious being that is viable and be upset over the termination of a fetus who is neither fully conscious or viable?
Yet another example of how if we assume that the anti-choice movement is based on a concern for (what they consider to be) human life, it often makes no sense at all, but if we assume it's based on a desire to punish women for having sex they disapprove of, the movement is entirely consistent.
I have great respect for those people. At least they are consistent. But they are usually too busy to stand outside of planed parenthood or partake in discussions about abortion on the internet.What do you make of people who support the whole/consistent life ethic? There are people who reject abortion, capital punishment, assisted suicide and war for philosophical and theological reasons that they can articulate pretty well. They are also generally supportive of social welfare improvements (i.e. universal health care, support for poor families, etc).
- I'd say that they're rare.What do you make of people who support the whole/consistent life ethic? There are people who reject abortion, capital punishment, assisted suicide and war for philosophical and theological reasons that they can articulate pretty well. They are also generally supportive of social welfare improvements (i.e. universal health care, support for poor families, etc).