icant said:
Hi Apple,
I don't remember saying that the BBT was an assumption,
I did say: "As I stated there is nothing but an assumption to support the BBT. (Support=Evidence)
Then I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you clarify? Are the evidences that support the BBt assumptions?
Ok let me see what I can do with that.
# 1. There is evidence that the universe is expanding.
a. The Redshift of Galaxies as they are moving away from us indicates the universe is expanding.
1a. That seems to support that the expansion began in one place.
# 2. Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation which is supposed been a snapshot of the early universe when it was only 380,000 years old. This is supposed to tell us it was a very bright place.
When the universe began to exist as we see it today with all that light that had been shinning for past eternity until that time began to move and spread out in all directions I would assume it was a light show like no other light show.
Isaiah:40:21 Asks a question
Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth?
Isaiah 40:22
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof
are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
Everybody likes to make fun of what Isaiah says, because stretching out of the universe does not sit well with their understanding of and expanding universe.
Isaiah was a tent dweller, so he used his language to explain what he meant by describing how a tent is set up. I was in the Military and went on bib Wack and I was glad my tent had a floor in it. Setting it up required to anchor the corners first. Then stretch out the walls and roof. So, he is talking about stretching it in all directions which, I think is what the universe is supposed to be doing.
So, the BBT tells me my Bible is correct and that was written 2400 years before the BB came along.
Then I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you clarify? Are the evidences that support the BBt assumptions?
Does the BBT claim to know the source or that the energy needs a source?
I say that the BBT is based on a host of assumptions. As anything presented so far has been in complete agreement with the Biblical presentation of creation. l am not a YEC but an old earth and universe believer as that is what the Bible teaches. Not what these guys have had to put with.
I would think so as: During the Big Bang, all matter and energy were concentrated in a very small, hot, and dense point. What I have never figured out is where that place could be as there was only non-existence when it is said to have been in this point. Now if everybody was trying to convince me that this was just based on an assumption, I would not have a problem with that. But every one here is adamite that it is a fact. Which it is not.
I would like to just make a comment here. I hear mentioned about the :BBT making predictions which it does not. A prediction is something that is told far in advance of the event taking place. The BBT is based completely on events that have taken place in the past.
Enjoy,