• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Removal of Feeding Tube

  • Thread starter angellous_evangellous
  • Start date
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
As you all will know soon, Terri Schivo's feeding tube was removed this afternoon. Her doctors think that it will still take a week or two for her to die.

What are your feelings on this?
 

Saw11_2000

Well-Known Member
Needs to be done. I doubt that anyone would want to live that way, I certainly wouldn't. Although, I'm not sure about starving her...
 

Jaymes

The cake is a lie
May she pass to the next life peacefully. I only regret that we've held her back so long.
 

BUDDY

User of Aspercreme
I think that it is so sad. I really feel sorry for her parents in all of this. They had no way to protect their daughter, and now they must watch her starve to death. I just want to cry. It breaks my heart. This is nothing more than state mandated murder. Her husband got his way and now he can continue his affair. I do think their are times when you must pull the plug (brain death, yet on breathing machine for example), but Terri is still alive. It is true that she can not feed herself, but she can still interact with people around her. I just can't believe that this is happening to her. I pray for her family.:(
 

Saw11_2000

Well-Known Member
EEWRED said:
I think that it is so sad. I really feel sorry for her parents in all of this. They had no way to protect their daughter, and now they must watch her starve to death. I just want to cry. It breaks my heart. This is nothing more than state mandated murder. Her husband got his way and now he can continue his affair. I do think their are times when you must pull the plug (brain death, yet on breathing machine for example), but Terri is still alive. It is true that she can not feed herself, but she can still interact with people around her. I just can't believe that this is happening to her. I pray for her family.:(
If you were in this situation would you want to live?

I of course wouldn't want to be starved, I would want more lethal injection or something quick and painless.

I also think that her husband is a piece of $#*( trying to continue his affair like you said, but regardless of that, I'd rather die.
 

BUDDY

User of Aspercreme
She had no living will. We don't know what she would have wanted done. Her parents seem to think that she would have wanted to continue to fight. So she can't eat on her own. Does that give anyone the right to starve her to death? Have you ever seen anyone starve to death? It is horrific. This is horrible. I can't believe what this country is coming to. Who are we to decide what life is legitimate and what life is not? Who gives us this right? Who are we to say, "Terri, you are not allowed to fight any more." She has been fighting against the dying of the light for so long, we are doing humanity a disservice.

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
We had a case here, in the last month or so where the courts ruled that the doctors' recommendations that a baby of ten months not be rescusitated against the parent's wishes. It is a horrible predicament for which there is 'no win' for every one concerned.
My heart goes out to the parents.:eek:
 

Saw11_2000

Well-Known Member
EEWRED said:
She had no living will. We don't know what she would have wanted done. Her parents seem to think that she would have wanted to continue to fight. So she can't eat on her own. Does that give anyone the right to starve her to death? Have you ever seen anyone starve to death? It is horrific. This is horrible. I can't believe what this country is coming to. Who are we to decide what life is legitimate and what life is not? Who gives us this right? Who are we to say, "Terri, you are not allowed to fight any more." She has been fighting against the dying of the light for so long, we are doing humanity a disservice.

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
I don't think there was a chance that she could recover from it though. No, personally I have never seen someone starved to death, but I know it is horrific. If I were her parents I would at the least fight for a different way of death, not starving.
 

BUDDY

User of Aspercreme
We had a case here, in the last month or so where the courts ruled that the doctors' recommendations that a baby of ten months not be rescusitated against the parent's wishes.
Guys, please, please, understand that this is no where near the case for Terri. She is living and breathing and no where near death. She just can't feed herself and has brain damage. There are thousands of cases like hers all over this country. We have now set a presidence where we can stop taking care of those who can't care for themselves and starve them to death. This is not a case of whether to rescusitate or not.
 

Jaymes

The cake is a lie
She isn't going to feel any pain as she starves to death. Her brain is already surrounded by a hypotonic solution, and she can't feel any pain.

Think about it. How would you like to be unable to really live life for years on end? Would you want to keep living on the off chance you might by some miracle get up and walk, or would you want to just end it? If you want to answer 'yes,' try going and laying perfectly still for a few hours, and think about how that would be for years.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
This situation is beyond my judgement, but starving to death medically is not really comparable to starving to death being fully aware. The medical feeding tube is an entirely different sensation than struggling with hunger. The feeding tube does not place food in one's belly removing the pain of hunger, but rather is simply water and basic nutrients injected into the bloodstream. She will not feel the pain of starvation.
 

BUDDY

User of Aspercreme
I was in Somalia quite a while back, and there were thousands of starving people, mostly women and children. It is so sad. I left a piece of my soul over there I think.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
EEWRED said:
Guys, please, please, understand that this is no where near the case for Terri. She is living and breathing and no where near death. She just can't feed herself and has brain damage. There are thousands of cases like hers all over this country. We have now set a presidence where we can stop taking care of those who can't care for themselves and starve them to death. This is not a case of whether to rescusitate or not.
No where near death is not really an appropraite way to approach the situation. If her doctors did not affix the feeding tubes, she would already be dead. She is in hospice care, which means that she is fatally sick and expected to die soon.

EDIT: This is also not the first case of the removal of feeding tubes, and we do have precedence for the practice all over the United States and elsewhere. This became a legal issue only because of Terri's parents. Had the parents and husband been unified, there would have been no legal issue at all.
 

Melody

Well-Known Member
Saw11_2000 said:
I also think that her husband is a piece of $#*( trying to continue his affair like you said, but regardless of that, I'd rather die.
<sigh> He could have continued his relationship with this other woman with Terry still on the feeding tube. It doesn't wash as a reason for his fight to remove it.
 

BUDDY

User of Aspercreme
I can't believe what I am reading here. You guys actually think that it is alright for this womans piece of crap husband to have her killed because she is an inconvenience to his extramarital affair? She is ALIVE. It may not be the life that you or I would prefer, but it is still life. What gives us the right to decide who lives and who dies? Who empowered us to make that decision? Who do we think we are? Does this mean we can now indiscriminately go from hospital to hospital, pulling feeding tubes because, "I wouldn't want to live like this." What kind of reasoning is that? I am just amazed that anyone would agree with this decision. Boggles my mind.
 

Saw11_2000

Well-Known Member
EEWRED said:
Guys, please, please, understand that this is no where near the case for Terri. She is living and breathing and no where near death. She just can't feed herself and has brain damage. There are thousands of cases like hers all over this country. We have now set a presidence where we can stop taking care of those who can't care for themselves and starve them to death. This is not a case of whether to rescusitate or not.
Michael Schiavo says his wife told him she would not want to be kept alive artificially. Her parents dispute that, saying she could get better and that their daughter has laughed, cried, smiled and responded to their voices. Court-appointed physicians testified her brain damage was so severe that there was no hope she would ever have any cognitive abilities.
I use that as my justification for that, not because Mike says she wouldn't, but because the doctors say she has no hope.

<sigh> He could have continued his relationship with this other woman with Terry still on the feeding tube. It doesn't wash as a reason for his fight to remove it.
I never said it was a reason. I personally would rather have died if I was in that situation if my spouse said keep him alive or kill him. I doubt anyone would want to live that way.
She isn't going to feel any pain as she starves to death. Her brain is already surrounded by a hypotonic solution, and she can't feel any pain.

Think about it. How would you like to be unable to really live life for years on end? Would you want to keep living on the off chance you might by some miracle get up and walk, or would you want to just end it? If you want to answer 'yes,' try going and laying perfectly still for a few hours, and think about how that would be for years.
Nice point.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
In Terri's case, we should also consider that her feeing tube was removed once before and she did not die. Jeb Bush and others pushed a law thru to reinsert the tube. It is quite possible that this issue will not be over soon.
 

Saw11_2000

Well-Known Member
^Very likely indeed, but I don't it will be mini-me-Bush this time. He "overstepped his authority" last time, and I don't think he will do it again.
 
Top