Republicans consider removing Biden from state ballots. A new fad is born.

[Laniakea]

Or called "false accusations", which seems to be your m.o. anyway on so many of your posts.

I've just provided you with proof, and now you're ignoring it, just as I figured you would.

 

[Laniakea]

What's racist about admonishing someone else for playing the race card?
(And is that not what you're doing on this thread regarding AOC?)

Ah, so now you're using the projection method to deflect blame?

 

[Laniakea]

What's racist about admonishing someone else for playing the race card?
(And is that not what you're doing on this thread regarding AOC?)

Ah, so now you want to project blame? The Squad plays the race card in every way, and then their defenders try to make it look like it's everyone else who's racist. Classic liberal tactic: Blame the other side for you yourself do.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Ah, so now you're using the projection method to deflect blame?

I'm asking you a question about your claim and making an observation about the things you've posted.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Ah, so now you want to project blame? The Squad plays the race card in every way, and then their defenders try to make it look like it's everyone else who's racist. Classic liberal tactic: Blame the other side for you yourself do.

Blame? I'm just asking you about your claims. It's okay, it's what goes on in these debate forums.

The article you've provided doesn't show that.
What it shows is AOC admonishing someone else for playing the race card.

 

[Laniakea]

Blame? I'm just asking you about your claims. It's okay, it's what goes on in these debate forums.

The article you've provided doesn't show that.
What it shows is AOC admonishing someone else for playing the race card.

By making that accusation, she's projecting.
No different than discriminating against white people to favor blacks, while at the same time claiming whites are the racists. It takes the attention away from what they're doing, the same way a magician diverts the audience's attention away from what he's doing to create the illusion.

 

[metis]

I've just provided you with proof, and now you're ignoring it, just as I figured you would.

I did not ignore it as I explained.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Democrats do everything behind closed doors themselves. I'm actually shocked the Trump trial March will be televised.

Kind of puts the damper on the whole Republican behind doors thing.

There are times to do things behind closed doors and there are times not to. If national security is involved that will be behind closed doors. There is nothing in the false attacks on Biden through his son that need to be behind closed doors.

For some reason when it comes to politics you have trouble reasoning rationally and consistently. You are letting your emotions and prejudices affect your reasoning.

 

[Subduction Zone]

He showed up as his way of saying, "I'll show up when I want to, and on my own terms", in defiance of a subpoena that ordered him to show up at a certain day and time, at which point he instead put on a show outside the building.
Maybe the "Big Guy" informed him that he's above the law after all.

No, the subpoena was for a behind the doors grilling. He would have shown up at the time that they specified if they had an open doors session. Don't you follow the news at all?

 

[Subduction Zone]

And when he was about to be questioned, he ran away.
Hunter has become the hunted.

Again that is false. He did not "run away". He refused a secret closed door session. When he was subpoenaed he said that he would show up if it was open to the public. That is the opposite of running away. He has no state secrets. There is no reason to have a behind closed doors session.

 

[Laniakea]

No, the subpoena was for a behind the doors grilling. He would have shown up at the time that they specified if they had an open doors session. Don't you follow the news at all?

Another way of saying that would be, "He would have shown up and done as he was told if he wanted to".
Try that sometime if you ever get a court summons. See how far it gets you as a non-Biden.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Another way of saying that would be, "He would have shown up and done as he was told if he wanted to".
Try that sometime if you ever get a court summons. See how far it gets you as a non-Biden.

Court summons are never to shut off to the public court. Your own example shows how you are wrong.

 

[Twilight Hue]

There are times to do things behind closed doors and there are times not to. If national security is involved that will be behind closed doors. There is nothing in the false attacks on Biden through his son that need to be behind closed doors.

For some reason when it comes to politics you have trouble reasoning rationally and consistently. You are letting your emotions and prejudices affect your reasoning.

No I'm obviously not alone with my train of thought on these matters.

I'm not so massively conceited as to think I have the upper ground on any of it and voicing it in a superior tone as many people have shown already in their responses to things they don't like.

 

[Laniakea]

Again that is false. He did not "run away". He refused a secret closed door session. When he was subpoenaed he said that he would show up if it was open to the public. That is the opposite of running away. He has no state secrets. There is no reason to have a behind closed doors session.

Run, Hunter! RUN!!!

 

[metis]

Another way of saying that would be, "He would have shown up and done as he was told if he wanted to".
Try that sometime if you ever get a court summons. See how far it gets you as a non-Biden.

What about the Republicans who didn't show up for the January 6th House Commitee hearings?

 

[Twilight Hue]

Another way of saying that would be, "He would have shown up and done as he was told if he wanted to".
Try that sometime if you ever get a court summons. See how far it gets you as a non-Biden.

Good point and something they will ignore in their response to you.

 

[Laniakea]

Court summons are never to shut off to the public court. Your own example shows how you are wrong.

A subpoena is a subpoena, whether you like the conditions or not.

 

[Laniakea]

What about the Republicans who didn't show up for the January 6th House Commitee hearings?

They were publicly arrested and imprisoned, to make Trump-haters happy.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No I'm obviously not alone with my train of thought on these matters.

I'm not so massively conceited as to think I have the upper ground on any of it and voicing it in a superior tone as many people have shown already in their responses to things they don't like.

Did you even have a point here?

 

[Twilight Hue]

Run, Hunter! RUN!!!

Yeah he certainly could have complied with the summons , but he didn't and no doubt he ran ran ran away!