Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I find that ethics and morality can be useful on this sort of thing, but they only apply after the strictly religious topics are answered.I was actually wondering that, Penumbra. A lot of questions seem to be about ethics, morality, and so on - not about religion.
Some of the questions and understandings of the religion seem a bit, well, superficial too, sadly.
I'm not sure. Some people do go church-shopping, and the phrase "find a new church" has been used commonly in my observation.Would someone be likely to associate with a group with whom they held little in common with outside of religious beliefs, unless they had to (i.e., there was only one congregation about)? What do you think?
Or Choodianism.Heh. It'd be amazing, but odd, to see Cao Dai on that.
Belief-O-Matic- Beliefnet.comIs there a link anyone can give me to take something like this?
My primary issue with the test was its seeming bias, and emotionally loaded language, promoting or drawing attention to some answers over others.
I gave most of those maximum importance too, because while they aren't too important for my life, they are very important when it comes to labeling me with a religion.I thought so too. For some questions, like belief in a deity, it makes no sense to lump "there is no god" together with "don't know, other, or not important". That annoyed me. A few times I picked that option and gave it maximum importance just to mess with their heads.