paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Yajurveda, Rigveda have been translated. So translation is possible, if one has the clarity of the concepts. PleaseSorry these have no English equivalents.
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yajurveda, Rigveda have been translated. So translation is possible, if one has the clarity of the concepts. PleaseSorry these have no English equivalents.
Yajurveda, Rigveda have been translated. So translation is possible, if one has the clarity of the concepts. Please
Regards
I wrote that last post for nothing?
Yajurveda, Rigveda have been translated. So translation is possible, if one has the clarity of the concepts. Please
Regards
Yajurveda, Rigveda have been translated. So translation is possible, if one has the clarity of the concepts. Please
Regards
No, sorry cant translate everything in Sanskrit, sorry
@SatyamavejayantiAdhyatmic, Adhibhautic, Adhidevic and Adhiyagnic: Rough translation. Adhi - what refers to.
Adhyatmic (adhi+atmic) = referring to God/soul.
Adhibhautic (Bhoota - things that have come to exist, Adhi+bhautic) = referring to what is seen to exist, material.
Adhidaivik (Adhi+Daivik, Devas and Devis, deities) = referring to deities.
Adhiyagnic (Yajna - rituals) = referring to rituals.
Why get tired? One doesn't even believe in Veda, being a strong Atheism believer, as a divine scripture. One considers it just as a social or history source of the Aryans. Am I right? PleaseSatyam could have done it, but not everyone is as patient as I am in replying to your questions. They get tired, I never tire.
Being a strong atheist does not bar me from listening and accepting words of wisdom. You are right, perhaps because of my supposed Aryan descent, I value Vedas for being the most important source of the Aryan history, and their social and religious life. I am very much interested in religious history.One doesn't even believe in Veda, being a strong Atheism believer, as a divine scripture. One considers it just as a social or history source of the Aryans. Am I right?
But one doesn't believe that the Veda/Yajurveda is divine, from gods/God. Does one? PleaseBeing a strong atheist does not bar me from listening and accepting words of wisdom. You are right, perhaps because of my supposed Aryan descent, I value Vedas for being the most important source of the Aryan history, and their social and religious life. I am very much interested in religious history.
Not me, at least. Part of one of the hymns of RigVeda is supposed to have been written by my great-great-grandpa, Upamanyu.
Does one mean the following? If yes, please highlight the part added/written by one's great-great-grandpa , Upamanyu in the Veda in some color:http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv09097.htm. It is a long song.
So, you mean that Veda/Yajurveda is not at all "eternal" as is claimed here (in this forum but in another forum) , its contents have been continuously been added/increased, period after periods and now nobody knows exactly who wrote which verse, that speaks of its volume been increased from one Volume to several over time. Right? PleaseThis hymn is a combined effort of poets who belong to one genealogical line, the Vasishthas (except for the last two). Upamanyu's father's name is also included in the list (Vyaghrapada). Mrilika, from the same family, seems to have been a woman poet. But which verse was added by whom is not mentioned in the list. It is possible that the verses were written over a long period of time (even centuries) and not at the same time. There is no way of knowing what is not mentioned.
"Maitravaruni Vasishtha, Indrapramati Vasishtha, Vrishanag Vasishtha, Manyu Vasishtha, Upamanyu Vasishtha, Vyaghrapada Vasishtha, Sakti Vasishtha, Karnasruta Vasishtha, Mrilika Vasishtha, Shukra Vasishtha along with Parashara Shakta and Kutsa Angirasa."
I suppose by this time you know that Hindus may have different views about things. As I have said in the last post that I do not believe that Vedas are 'Word of God' and there have been additions, and there are hymns which have been lost during the thousands of years. But then, I am a rare bird, an athiest. My views do not represent the whole of Hinduism. Most Hindus do accept Vedas as eternal and unchangeable, even through the periodic destruction and regeneration of the universe. No change whatsoever, no abrogations in like Quran, no change of God's mind. Not that at one time, he wanted people to face Jerusalem during Salah and later directed people to face Mecca.So, you mean that Veda/Yajurveda is not at all "eternal" as is claimed here (in this forum but in another forum) , its contents have been continuously been added/increased, period after periods and now nobody knows exactly who wrote which verse, that speaks of its volume been increased from one Volume to several over time.
Never-mind about Hinduism, they have grown only in the Post-Vedic period, no Hinduism existed in the Vedic-Period. Right,everybody!? PleaseI suppose by this time you know that Hindus may have different views about things. As I have said in the last post that I do not believe that Vedas are 'Word of God' and there have been additions, and there are hymns which have been lost during the thousands of years. But then, I am a rare bird, an athiest. My views do not represent the whole of Hinduism. Most Hindus do accept Vedas as eternal and unchangeable, even through the periodic destruction and regeneration of the universe. No change whatsoever, no abrogations in like Quran, no change of God's mind. Not that at one time, he wanted people to face Jerusalem during Salah and later directed people to face Mecca.
Vedas were never eternal which is evidenced from the additions and subtractions that have taken place in them and also from the portions that have lost. There was no promise from Brahman for their being secured and protected. Please read post #58 above that will benefit one.Quran, which speaks of Allah, was revealed and written around 600Ce. Therefore, Allah, is not eternal. Yes. Thanks. Okay?
Veda, the Word (shabda -Om) is aupaurusheya (not of human origin). It pervades the three periods of time and is situated transcendentally as the very Brahman. It is revealed to sages, who too are present as our mind-senses.