Yes, they do eat the meat afterwards in West African religions.If they're going to eat it then I don't care.
That's probably as quick of a death can be compared to being shot in the body by hunters.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, they do eat the meat afterwards in West African religions.If they're going to eat it then I don't care.
That's probably as quick of a death can be compared to being shot in the body by hunters.
I don't see what's so "dark" about it. If you're going to eat them anyway, you might as well give their death a sacred meaning. It's more respectful than a lot of other forms of slaughter where the animal is just viewed as an object that means nothing.It is a terrible thing to have such darkened views about one's divinities that termination of life on their behalf seems necessary.
In ancient times, some high-minded people knew these views about the gods should be rejected. Empedocles said: wretched is the man, whose beliefs about the gods are 'dark'.
Marcus Aurelius asked questions about what should we say is befitting a god in their actions? To be less just than humans are capable? Not so...
If you're going to eat them anyway, you might as well give their death a sacred meaning.
You have to keep in mind that these religions are usually practiced by rural people where slaughtering your own food is a daily activity. So this is not anything shocking or weird to people who raise their own food. Urban people tend to be pretty stupid about these things. They slaughter the animal and then eat it as a part of a sacred meal shared between those taking part in the rite and the Lwa (or Orishas, depending on the religion at hand). They are dedicating the animal's energy to the rite and offering something of importance to the spirits (the Lwa or Orishas are not deities in the sense that a Neopagan would think of).Not especially, if you're doing it because you think the gods want it. Is that what this is about, or slaughter?
They are dedicating the animal's energy to the rite and offering something of importance to the spirits
Yeah, I know you're a vegetarian who believes in ahimsa. Of course you won't agree with it.I see what you're saying about the community aspect, but that doesn't necessarily justify it in my view. This goes deeper than just sacrifice for me, but this thread isn't about that.
As Lvcifer Invictvs said, they do eat it, and this article supports that claim:Unless you have a BBQ later it seems a waste.
I was talking about animal sacrifice overall in any religion according to me, just an observation. As far as voodoo goes there are about as many different types and denominations with varying customs as many other religions have.As Lvcifer Invictvs said, they do eat it, and this article supports that claim:
What is Voodoo? Making Sense of Animal Sacrifice, the Undead and Possession | HuffPost
And in certain Native American religions one can consume peyote legally.To add to my post above, there is actually specific laws to protect ritual slaughter and it specifically lists religions like Voodoo and Judaism.
Are you vegan? If not, that's just hypocrisy.
That's your opinion. I don't agree that killing something and then eating it is inherently inhumane. You must feel very guilty when you eat, so I wonder why you're not a vegan. The "inhumane" part is to do with the treatment of the animal. They can be killed in slow and torturous ways or in relatively quick and painless ways.The fact I'm not a vegan in no way diminishes the fact that killing when it's not necessary is an inherently inhumane act. It would be hypocrisy if I was pretending myself better than these people even though I eat meat which I'm not.
I'm merely pointing out that 'killing humanely' is something of an oxymoron; even more so when done in such a way that the animal suffers throughout the process.