Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not needed hereIs it, care to demonstrate any objective evidence for that claim?
What's your point?"The world is mad." (Voltaire) Logic and logical reasoning is not the king of science at all. The authority (of God's or satan's) is the king of science. After all, the absolutely logical and technically flawless 1905 AD articles of Prof. Albert Einstein for five years and more did not have the slightest meaning for all the scientists of the world (except for Einstein's Editor and Friend - most famous Prof. Niels Bohr), from their impure and arrogant lips it sounded "he does not even work as a physicist", "he is just a patent clerk", "how dare he argue with Sir Newton?", "This is Jewish science."
We cannot exclude that irrational bias is present in science. for a while, at least, For the simple reason that scientists are humans with all their prejudices at all."The world is mad." (Voltaire) Logic and logical reasoning is not the king of science at all. The authority (of God's or satan's) is the king of science. After all, the absolutely logical and technically flawless 1905 AD articles of Prof. Albert Einstein for five years and more did not have the slightest meaning for all the scientists of the world (except for Einstein's Editor and Friend - most famous Prof. Niels Bohr), from their impure and arrogant lips it sounded "he does not even work as a physicist", "he is just a patent clerk", "how dare he argue with Sir Newton?", "This is Jewish science."
Einstein was miraculously lucky with journal editor - Bohr.
Universe is four dimensional, hence, there cannot be Universe without humans. TRUST ME, I KNOW.
Many people attempting to make sound arguments make loud ones instead (but loudness is a property of sound). My sister is magna cum loudest in debates.
Isn't it possible that a deity made conditions for life?
Some believe that it is a fluke of nature that earth has all three phases of water (vapor, liquid/steam, and ice). These are responsible for life as we know it.
Assuming that planets were made by accretion of matter in rings of matter in a disk around the sun (much like the rings of Saturn), we could assume that such acccretion began as chunks of frozen matter. That is, the earth might have been formed by water freezing, forming chunks that stuck to each other, and as more and more mass stuck, the earth was formed. Similarly, Jupiter might have been formed by methane freezing into chunks. All of the planets may be at the point where some gas freezes and forms chunks. If this frozen chunk idea (not theory) is correct, then there might be water planets around most stars. This would make it much more likely that life, as we know it, exists somewhere in the vast universe.
And human is "God" his Creation, right?
Is it, care to demonstrate any objective evidence for that claim?
Not needed here
As I did not phrase it as a claim, but a question.
The World is a complicated compromise between Mr. Madness and Mr. Reason.So, all of this teaches us that, ultimately, evidence is all that counts between accepting a theory, or rejecting it. If godlike Newton is declared wrong, then there are no ultimate holy cows
Perceptive. Our emotions (in fact, the totality of what we as organisms do) are the algorithms that move life forward.Perhaps emotions are what the Divine God wanted us to experience (love, etc).
Prettier dresses?But not Eastern Orthodox Christians. There is difference from Eastern Orthodox Christians and all other types of Christians.
Actually, on the whole, atheists typically do better at understanding science than religious believers.Isn't it supposed to be the atheists on this forum whose understanding of science is really bad?
Wow! Just wow! No wonder some of us have some difficulty accepting your claims to special genius.Universe is a box with borders: ranging from 1905 AD upto 2030 AD. Hence if you were alive at 1906AD, then you belong to Universe forever and ever.
I dont fit in to that box so I don't belong in this UniverseUniverse is a box with borders: ranging from 1905 AD upto 2030 AD. Hence if you were alive at 1906AD, then you belong to Universe forever and ever.
If "stop" is inevitable, only then we are "stopping".Where they then differ is that the believer is likely to stop there
I have not the slightest idea of what you are talking about. I am out.The World is a complicated compromise between Mr. Madness and Mr. Reason.
This principle explains the presence of both Theory of Evolution and General Relativity.
And explains both sanctions against Holy Russian Church and North Korea.
And explains difference in treatment of bi-sexuals and zoophiles.
The materials which constitute your body and make possible your biochemistry and bioelectricity indeed belong to the universe for as long as there's a universe.Universe is a box with borders: ranging from 1905 AD upto 2030 AD. Hence if you were alive at 1906AD, then you belong to Universe forever and ever.
I presume by "the Godless one" you are referring to me (since you are citing what I wrote). Therefore, I urge you to look at what you yourself just wrote, and check it against your own claims to superior intelligence.If "stop" is inevitable, only then we are "stopping".
The godless one objected that the atheist-scientist continues to study when the believer stops. But the fact is that the atheist continues to move forward when it is impossible to move forward: we have come up against a miracle, not unknown laws of matter.
"The world is mad." (Voltaire) Logic and logical reasoning is not the king of science at all. The authority (of God's or satan's) is the king of science. After all, the absolutely logical and technically flawless 1905 AD articles of Prof. Albert Einstein for five years and more did not have the slightest meaning for all the scientists of the world (except for Einstein's Editor and Friend - most famous Prof. Niels Bohr), from their impure and arrogant lips it sounded "he does not even work as a physicist", "he is just a patent clerk", "how dare he argue with Sir Newton?", "This is Jewish science."
1. Universe is there,
2. Humans are there.
Hence, there cannot be Universe without humans.