He was NOT defending Trump when he was defaming those women! He was defaming them as an integral part of trying to subvert an American election. That makes it even worse!People think that defending Trump is a priori criminal.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"Rudy Giuliani must give control of...
- Thread starter Regiomontanus
- Start date
Whatever his past, it gives him no right to slander & libel
innocent people, causing them great harm.
Or do you believe that he really does have that right?
As NYC mayor, he fought innocent people using criminal
means, eg, the unconstitutional policy of Stop And Frisk.
You didn't know this?
You "would suggest" sounds like you might suggest, but aren't.
I suggest that you be less coy.
And that you eschew whataboutism.
Says the guy from the region that gave us the Mafia.....who has given sanctuary to too many mobsters...instead of executing them.
Hypocritical whataboutism.
Last edited:
God only knows what happened in Georgia.
I doubt they were innocent.
Thanks to the laissez-faire in the United States certain rats were welcomed in your country.
Unfortunately the millions of dollars mobsters possess, open every door in the US...
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
I think people who commit crimes are criminals.People think that defending Trump is a priori criminal.
Like Trump.
And Giuliani.
Unlike your God, the courts in GA objectively exist.
And they rule based upon evidence.
It doesn't surprise me that someone from a country
that loved both Mussolini & Hitler would believe
that cops should have the power to stop & frisk
anyone they want for any reason (whim, bigotry,
bullying, anger, etc) with impunity.
You & I have very different values about liberty
& governance.
Italy sent the rats here.
@Estro Felino....
Do you support Guiliani's policy of allowing cops
to stop & frisk anyone they want, without reasonable
articulable suspicion that the committed or about
to commit a crime?
Do you support Guiliani's policy of allowing cops
to stop & frisk anyone they want, without reasonable
articulable suspicion that the committed or about
to commit a crime?
Zero tolerance for the criminals.
I value honest businesses.
Evidently they fled to the extremely liberal and libertarian USA because they were hunted down in Italy...
Last edited:
Absolutely.
Last edited:
Apparently not, if you believe that cops can abuse
anyone they want in violation of the Constitution.
That's disgusting.
You express titillation at the prospect of being abused by a cop.
Many innocent people suffer greatly when groped, raped, beaten,
shot, arrested, insulted, & tazed. And you find it sexually arousing.
Again....that's disgusting.
It's evil.
Have you no humanity for innocent people who suffer?
The filth you post has inspired me to go do something
else somewhere else.
Hey, "Jurist," in law, they are innocent until they are proven guilty.
With the same reasoning...do I have the right to think that Giuliani is innocent?
A jury of his peers found otherwise. That is called living by the rule of law.
Spice
StewardshipPeaceIntergityCommunityEquality
As the old saying goes, "Never let your mouth write a check your a$$ can't cash."
Alien826
No religious beliefs
And hair dye stains.
As has Kamala Harris. Therefore?
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Well I do think the penalty should fit the crime.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Well these are civil litigations , not criminal in this case, but we went through the criminal stuff already in past threads so I'm not going to dwell on it
Quite a lot of civil and criminal stuff to go through, isn't there?
If ever you’re on a jury making that decision it will mean something. As it is a jury that didn’t include you made their decision. And that’s what means something. Guliani made untrue statements and the lives of public servants were permanently damaged. He should have known better. His contempt for the law might have contributed to the penalty. He’s never apologized or admitted wrongdoing. MAGAs need to learn that laws apply to them.