Just to clarify: I meant that I eventually stopped caring to the point I no longer kept checking whether the post remained intact. Not that something was done but that I didn't care anymore.
So now you're saying you don't know if the post you reported was taken care of or not but you decided to come in here and claim that you knew that it wasn't.
To what purpose?
(This is aside from the fact that originally you were implying that the problem included multiple reports that you had made)
How long am I supposed to wait before I come to the conclusion nothing will be done?
We almost always get reports taken care of within a couple of days. And you're not supposed to come to any conclusions you're supposed to go look.
I am not going to bother looking up for an example if I don't see it as anything more than a waste of time to me.
Spreading rumors is a valid use of your time but bothering to validate those rumors isn't.
Got it.
It has been easily over an year the last time I remember reporting someone. I have my ways of finding what post I reported, but it would take a massive ammount of time and for what purpose?
I didn't ask you to find the post, I offered to do that for you if you tell me the name of the person you reported and give me a general time frame.
Just to get you to tell me you don't consider what I reported to be trolling?
How do you know what I'm going to tell you? You made an accusation and now you refusing to validate the accusation.
Why? Well obviously because you know you can't.
Not actually addressing the main problem which is the lack of communication?
No actually the accusation you made wasn't about lack of communication. the accusation was that you reported something that was trolling or a personal attack and nothing was done about it.
Now, that's you're being asked to demonstrate what you're talking about you're trying to change the subject and/or claim you meant something else.
Let's be real here shall we?
Interested in spreading rumors about people but not interested in offering any evidence to support those rumors.
Again, got it.
do you not, always, get back to people when what they have reported is not considered an actual rule violation? This is the problem, those are the crickets I have mentioned in the first post.
And there's that back pedaling again.
In post #16
@sunrise said:
Sunrise said:
When I see something that to me is a clear rule violation and report it, sometimes I see the post is gone and at other times "crickets
Your response:
The crickets, as you call it, are the exact reason my rule of thumb is to never report any post.
Now obviously since
@sun rise is using "crickets" in opposition of "sometimes I see the post is gone", the term is intended to refer to the idea that a post has been reported but is still there.
Your response, "The
crickets, as you call it" is obviously an acknowledgment that you understand what the term is supposed to mean in this context and that you're using it in the same way.
So when, in your next post you say:
. . . : in a heated debate people may resort to personal attacks and trolling. I have reported those before just to hear the crickets, so I just don't bother anymore.
Anyone with eyes can see that what you're saying here is that you've reported personal attacks and trolling in the past and nothing was done about it.
(Emphasis in all of the above post is mine)
Edit: now
@Koldo, as I mentioned in a post earlier this thread is for people who want to have a productive conversation about moderation, not for people who want to post vindictive and unfounded rumors against the staff.
Now if you want to discuss this further feel free to send me a conversation message but I don't want to see any more posts from you in this thread.
And I mean not one.
