sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
Right...work on the symptoms, don't fix the problem.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Right...work on the symptoms, don't fix the problem.
Right...work on the symptoms, don't fix the problem.
Right...work on the symptoms, don't fix the problem.
Oh, I thought that was implied by the necessity thing. I didn't realize you don't realize that people are entitled to necessities. My bad.
Eliminating conservatism in America would go a long way.
You mean like food, water, 2ply toilet paper?Oh, I thought that was implied by the necessity thing. I didn't realize you don't realize that people are entitled to necessities. My bad.
You mean like food, water, 2ply toilet paper?
Right...work on the symptoms, don't fix the problem.
No they're turned away until it becomes an emergency.
Nope.
Jackytar
How do you then correlate these to fire/police protection and health care? Can you show that this was the intent of the founding fathers?
Yes, but then there would be no one left working to pay for it. Oh, wait the Fed could buy Treasury Bills and create new money...nevermindthen.If conservatives all suddenly vanished, we could provide healthcare to everyone, no problem.
You mean like food, water, 2ply toilet paper?
Eliminating conservatism in America would go a long way.
Personally, if my house were on fire I would rather it burn to the ground. Insurance would then cover the cost of a new home. Smoke damage is a pain in the but.Uninsured people die at a higher rate than insured people. I don't doubt houses without fire protection burn to the ground at a higher rate than those with, or that neighbourhoods with police patrolmen wandering around have lower crime rates than those without.
If you accept the "self-evident truth" that "all men are created equal" and have an "inalienable right to life" (in particular), the argument for equal protection from disaster, ill health and crime for all citizens follows quite naturally.
It would be quite a struggle to argue otherwise, in fact.
but...i...need...twoplyplease - two-play toilet paper is clearly a luxury.
Actually, it's true. Hospitals are only required to care for people without money if it's an emergency situation - thus, the usual strategy is to turn patients away until their condition gets serious, making it cost far more for everyone.
That is your reasoning? Necessity = entitlement? That's it? Really?
Jackytar
You mean like food, water, 2ply toilet paper?