Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Bible has over nine entire chapters devoted to detailed instructions from God on animal sacrifice, so this must have been of some importance to Christians of old, if it was not important to God himself.
So, what has happened to this ideal since then?
Check your chronology. The Bible has over nine entire chapters devoted to detailed instructions from God on animal sacrifice, so this must have been of some importance to Ancient Hebrews.The Bible has over nine entire chapters devoted to detailed instructions from God on animal sacrifice, so this must have been of some importance to Christians of old, if it was not important to God himself.
So, what has happened to this ideal since then?
fantôme profane;1241040 said:Check your chronology. The Bible has over nine entire chapters devoted to detailed instructions from God on animal sacrifice, so this must have been of some importance to Ancient Hebrews.
Of course we doDon't many Christians read and adhere to the ideas presented in the Bible?
Heb 10:12 said:But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God
Yes we adhere to a lot of the "ideas" presented in the Bible....But since the NT teaches us that since Jesus became the sacrifice for our sins and shed His blood for the remission of those sins that we are no longer under the law, but are under grace. We know longer use animals for sacrifice, Jesus was the sacrifice.....Christians were not called by the name Christian until the NT, the disciples were first called Christians at Antioch.....Don't many Christians read and adhere to the ideas presented in the Bible?
If that is so, then why did God find Abel's sacrifice more acceptable than Cain's?stephenw said:I would have thought that the idea of animal sacrifice was a human rather than just a Christian one.
I thought Cain brought "fruits of the soil" as an offering, not a sacrifice. We are not told exactly why one offering was better than the other, but we can infer that Cain should have known better from the verses that follow:If that is so, then why did God find Abel's sacrifice more acceptable than Cain's?
If that is so, then why did God find Abel's sacrifice more acceptable than Cain's?
Perhaps because the story evolved among pastoralists.If that is so, then why did God find Abel's sacrifice more acceptable than Cain's?