I've got a "theory". It goes like this: A sage feels a need for something. Say he or she feels a need to be celibate. So the sage becomes celibate.
Then the sage gets a disciple. The disciple decides it would be a good idea to emulate the sage so as to become a sage themselves. He or she observes that the sage is celibate, and decides to also be celibate.
But now you have a situation in which celibacy has come naturally to the sage, but willfully to the disciple.
My question is this: Is celibacy likely to have the same benefits for the sage as for the disciple? Will the disciple be likely to experience more and perhaps greater problems with celibacy than the sage?
Then the sage gets a disciple. The disciple decides it would be a good idea to emulate the sage so as to become a sage themselves. He or she observes that the sage is celibate, and decides to also be celibate.
But now you have a situation in which celibacy has come naturally to the sage, but willfully to the disciple.
My question is this: Is celibacy likely to have the same benefits for the sage as for the disciple? Will the disciple be likely to experience more and perhaps greater problems with celibacy than the sage?