Some witness, tidbits and "trivia" related to the San Bernardino Islamic terrorists attack, before they may "disappear" into the bowls of political correctness:
* I read and heard his name Syed Farook within less than an hour after the terrorist attack, first spelled "Said Farook" when it hit the right-wing forums very soon after the terrorism, then more but misspelling it "Sayed Farouk" and "Farooq", all in about 45 minutes later after the first "Said Farook" - how did they know? The answer is from the posters themselves who were in live threads on the active event ongoing, who were tapped into the entire County and police dispatches and calls and communications via scanners and special devices that can pickup the dispatches off the normal ranges. The name was picked up by them right away from police communications then posted, but misspelled, they also later picked up the name of "a female" but misspelled and mangled the pronunciation as taz-fin, they correctly identfied the second shooter as female WAY before the public knew. In addition, they noticed the vehicle was driving way slower than should be in a "high speed chase" and guessed "they seem to be unfamiliar" with a street they were on. They even put up a link on the internet to listen live to the police communications, this was shutdown (probably for good reason) about 15 minutes later. Not advocating these sort of monitorings, but it does show the authorities knew a huge amount very early - I think Obama knew too, the Obama administration is going to do everything to spin this as work place violence and without doubt use the toadies in government class "investigative" department to try to grab, seize and silence evidence otherwise for cover-yer-*** political agendas. But it is too late, and the local police agencies will not cooperate. And I was reading this guys employment records about 2 hours after the events from these right-wingers, the fact is nothing much can be "untouchable" in this day and age as the "know how" is well established among the "non-government" public so f.y.i.... They also, correctly, communicated that it appears there are 2 suspects, not 3, even though 3 would make things more dicey, that in fact there is no police confirmations that "gopro" cameras were being carried, it is a false report, but later indeed that bombs were found, today we know the terrorists were making IED's with the ability to be setoff remotely. It was, frankly, uncredible how fast these right-wingers had the full dope and how accurate they were. Again, I am not advocating such monitoring and tip offs, after all any other terrorists mught make use of such information - but their tech savey skills were proven. In addition, one right-wing AM local radio show had one of their gopher find the guy's internet presence and shared links of the guys circle to others who had Islamic terrorist links shared. Then these sites "disappeared" within 15 minutes later - suddenly the links didn't work - all hours before the public would first hear of such things. Of course, today, we have the police and other agencies statung the terrorist was in communications with known terrorist while in Saudi Arabia (doesn't mean Saudi's, in fact probably not Saudi's but while in Saudi Arabia in contact with Yemen, elsewhere) .... I also heard one of them had a Pakistani Passport even though the woman, his wife from Saudi Arabia, was not from Pakistan. If that is true - and I have good trust in the conservative sourcing of this tidbit - I think this is important and needs more revelation. Also, even though it is now known that she was shooting at the police while the guy was driving the SUV, there were live reports that at times the SUV was driving "way too slow" for a "high speed chase" and as some right-wungers commented: "the female might be from Saudi Arabia, they don't teach the women to drive". Perhaps she was a new driver indeed, they may have been taking turns or something, but the Saudi angle was an amazing comment - it turned out to be true, that he got his wife in Saudi Arabia.
* The employees recently had active shooter/terror assault/bombing threat training, I heard this mentioned by one of the persons present who was being interviewed - did this Muslim who was pre-planning some terrorist attack consider this "taking sides"?
My gut is, the guy wasn't ISIS (directly, though he was inspired by many such terror organizations), but rather in communication with operatives of the former Bin Laden group known generally as Al Qaeda. This Islamic terrorist attack will further lock-in the Republican victory for President.
