• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

San Fran’s DA mandates use of preferred pronouns

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
We should note that this applies only to
the local justice system & government.
When they impose rules upon just
themselves, I'm not concerned.
God! Just swat down the knee jerks and smack up those who wouldn't know a loss of rights if it bit them on the face.
They'll get up and keep going at it.
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member
Oh I don't deny it. If you only knew how bad I was bullied and harassed in the past.

The difference is I managed to build up a fair amount of teflon over the years. I didn't run screaming for protection to my big brother anymore , but rather stood up and faced my own demons rather then cry out for someone else for intervention. It took a loooong time to get there.

Trust me when I tell you, there is a lot to be said about going through hell to get to heaven. Like tempered steel, your less likely to break*.

*Thank you Benji. My mentor of teflon.

Nobody cares.

The idea is that a workplace is a place to work. It requires some harmony. For that reason you don't let employees insult and harass each other as to keep the work environment focused on work and running as smoothly as possible.

It's not a slippery slope. It's not an attack on personal freedom. It's not an attack on democracy. It's not new nor special. It's not unreasonable.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I don't believe that this is your real concern.
Yeah. We just can't be letting the state mandate the records be more consistent and not letting people answer what they think something should be.
Amd when Jordan Peterson predicted doom and martyrdom for refusing to comply? He tripped and fell face first into a pile of crap.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Yeah. We just can't be letting the state mandate the records be more consistent and not letting people answer what they think something should be.
Amd when Jordan Peterson predicted doom and martyrdom for refusing to comply? He tripped and fell face first into a pile of crap.
I was mostly thinking about the last thread like this that @icehorse did. He went on about "compelled speech" in the workplace - in that case, a public school. I responded with a personal story of a time when I had to give compelled speech in my workplace; the speech just had nothing to do with trans people or gender issues.

@icehorse seems to only be concerned with "compelled speech" when it involves treating trans people with respect, which suggests to me that the thing he actually has the problem with is treating trans people with respect.

As for the story in the OP... the DA's office is full of people who have voluntarily accepted the codes of conduct not only of their profession but also of their position as civil servants. These codes generally include obligations like treating clients and fellow professionals with respect, and not bringing their profession or their department into disrepute with their conduct. It's a bit sad that even with all that, it would be necessary to have to tell them that it means that trans coworkers, opposing counsel, court employees, victims of crime, etc. should be treated with respect.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Nobody cares.

The idea is that a workplace is a place to work. It requires some harmony. For that reason you don't let employees insult and harass each other as to keep the work environment focused on work and running as smoothly as possible.

It's not a slippery slope. It's not an attack on personal freedom. It's not an attack on democracy. It's not new nor special. It's not unreasonable.
Simple. You don't let people like that bother you.

Just got to be realistic that the world is that way for better or worse. It's a fact of life.

You adapt, overcome, or move on till you come to a place where one is comfortable and reasonably happy.
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member
Simple. You don't let people like that bother you.

Just got to be realistic that the world is that way for better or worse. It's a fact of life.

You adapt, overcome, or move on till you come to a place where one is comfortable and reasonably happy.

Exactly. Just learn to be polite and mind your own business with your coworkers even if you don't like who they are or what they do in their personal life. If you can't of course your world will be nothing than misery and "forbidden fruits" and attacks on your liberty. You are literally too selfish and antipathic for a productive and happy life in society.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Exactly. Just learn to be polite and mind your own business with your coworkers even if you don't like who they are or what they do in their personal life. If you can't of course your world will be nothing than misery and "forbidden fruits" and attacks on your liberty. You are literally too selfish and antipathic for a productive and happy life in society.
I learned you cannot force the world to change. Even if your in the right.

Let the karma take its own respective course if one cannot rectify the issue.

As for me, I see no point in always trying to change something I have no control over as there's always going to be something or someone, it's essentally fighting nature and sometimes it's not worth it, so I roam to where things are amicable and the chemistry is good.
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member
I learned you cannot force the world to change. Even if your in the right.

You haven't learned much then. The world has changed multiple time thanks to the efforts of people. Hell, when I was born, being gay was considered "bad" and the idea of gay marriage completely non-sense. Today, in my society, it's the opposite. Being homosexual is perfectly acceptable and gay marriage the law of the land for over a decade and even suggesting reverting course is considered at best ridiculous. All that is thanks to decades of fight, protest and education from gay rights activists.

As for me, I see no point in trying to change something I have no control over, there's always going to be something or someone, so I roam to where things are amicable and the chemistry is good.

Except you do have controls on your own words and you can absolutely learn to be polite towards others. Most people learn it quite well when they are little. Very few people are unlucky enough to be born with some defect that makes it hard if not impossible to learn empathy and basic courtesy.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
No it's never been the case. You never thought it was probably because you never held a job in the past or never were stupid enough to put this into practice with real people.

Let me give you a very clear example. If I believe you are a ****ing idiot and I so happen to be demonstrably right. You are a ****ing idiot and I, on the job, refer to you as a ****ing idiot and you were to complain to HR about my behavior or even sued me in a civil court (or even a criminal one should I go really overboard with it), you would certainly win. Me being technically correct doesn't give me the right to rob you of your basic dignity nor does it allow me to constantly make your job and your life harder by insulting and putting you down. Being "correct" isn't a protection against harassment. It could be a protection against charges of slander, but not harassment.

That's why I can't refer to my students as "gay boy" or "gay girl" even if I know they are homosexual. That would be demeaning and would constitute harassment. That its true and accurate, they are indeed gay and a boy/girl, doesn't change anything and you probably perfectly agree with that concept.

Can you really not see the difference between things you are not allowed to say (e.g. shouting "fire" in the theater), vs. being told there are certain things you MUST say?
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member
Can you really not see the difference between things you are not allowed to say (e.g. shouting "fire" in the theater), vs. being told there are certain things you MUST say?

You didn't read the post you are quoting because I specifically gave an example that isn't related to imminent danger or false alarm. I'll repeat it again. You are already not allowed to insult, belittle or harass your fellow colleagues, employees or boss. If you try you expose yourself to severe reprimand, losing your job or even lawsuits.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
You didn't read the post you are quoting because I specifically gave an example that isn't related to imminent danger or false alarm. I'll repeat it again. You are already not allowed to insult, belittle or harass your fellow colleagues, employees or boss. If you try you expose yourself to severe reprimand, losing your job or even lawsuits.

And those are things you CANNOT say. That's different than being told what you MUST say, right?
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member
And those are things you CANNOT say. That's different than being told what you MUST say, right?

You can't willfully misgender cisgender employees, coworkers and bosses either. It would be perceived as an insult in pretty much all cases. Thus you MUST gender them correctly. If you can't say insults, you must say other things.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Well then, you're being a jerk, because you're claiming I'm lying, and I'm not.
You don't say a peep about "compelled speech" except when the speech involves treating a trans person with respect.

If you were watching someone else behave the way you have been, what conclusions would you draw?
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Umm all work places restricts “free speech” in some form or another. Do you honestly think I could go into work tomorrow and call my coworker a slur, just for an example? I’d be disciplined if not fired if I did that. I’m still allowed to say whatever I want. But there will always be consequences. Social or work related. Used to be slurs were just everyday speech. Try using one in polite society and see for yourself.
Same thing is happening with pronouns. Doesn’t cost me any skin off my nose to be polite to someone. Apparently having manners and showing others respect violates free speech or something these days.
This is merely an update to societal rules. Happens all the time given how language and societal rules tends to evolve over time
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Top