Yeah. We just can't be letting the state mandate the records be more consistent and not letting people answer what they think something should be.
Amd when Jordan Peterson predicted doom and martyrdom for refusing to comply? He tripped and fell face first into a pile of crap.
I was mostly thinking about the last thread like this that
@icehorse did. He went on about "compelled speech" in the workplace - in that case, a public school. I responded with a personal story of a time when I had to give compelled speech in my workplace; the speech just had nothing to do with trans people or gender issues.
@icehorse seems to only be concerned with "compelled speech" when it involves treating trans people with respect, which suggests to me that the thing he actually has the problem with is treating trans people with respect.
As for the story in the OP... the DA's office is full of people who have voluntarily accepted the codes of conduct not only of their profession but also of their position as civil servants. These codes generally include obligations like treating clients and fellow professionals with respect, and not bringing their profession or their department into disrepute with their conduct. It's a bit sad that even with all that, it would be necessary to have to tell them that it means that
trans coworkers, opposing counsel, court employees, victims of crime, etc. should be treated with respect.