OurCreed, I find it interesting that you note that the support of people (scientists and philosophers) is in some way a support for the validity of your concept, however can I ask you in the hypothetical, if all of those people were killed before they learned of god, would it undermine the validity of your claim? If every single being were an atheist, would it mean that the concept of a god would be less valid? I would argue it would not; does that not mean that the non existence of people supporting the position has not detracted from the position's validity and that the reverse might also be true - that were people to support such a claim it does not make it more valid - the support of people is not a valid argument for it's accuracy.
I would also suggest that in a thread like 'science and religion are not compatible' merely asserting (rather than demonstrating) that logic and science point towards god and that miracles are reported to have happened does nothing but undermine your argument.