Science and religion

[ecco]

As some of you may know I'm an amateur scientist and I also study religion . The world says I am crazy and my notions are malarkey so I am going to write my notion in brief and would like your honest opinions if you think my notion is malarkey or understandable .

The N-field Theory

Abstract - The N-field theory is an united theory that unites field matter ( spatial quantum fields ) and atomic matter ( Visible objects ) into an united manifold that is independent of space , making reference to Albert Einsteins notion of space-time and Newtons absolute space . Additionally , the N-field theory explains a spontaneous creation of an Electrical Universe making reference to Dirac and Tesla .
Penultimately the N-field theory provides a set of simplicity maths to reach conclusion that the creation of the Universe is a miracle .

Extra content :

1:Explaining the nature of light

2:Explaining the mechanism of gravity

3:Explaining time


Does that look insane to anyone or doesn't make sense ?

I'll ask a six-year-old and get back to you.

 

[ecco]

I will rephrase , amateurs with smarts .

Yes. Unfortunately, you have demonstrated an inability to basic arithmetic.

 

[Subduction Zone]

More made up stuff, scientists try to fit that much stuff in a point its laughable .

Nope, repeatable observable experiments. You make up stuff, scientists are not allowed to do that.

 

[james blunt]

Nope, repeatable observable experiments. You make up stuff, scientists are not allowed to do that.

Yeah ok ! I make stuff up that uses your stuff so that must be made up then too .

 

[james blunt]

Yes. Unfortunately, you have demonstrated an inability to basic arithmetic.

Can you design a spaceship etc etc , maths malarkey indeed .

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yeah ok ! I make stuff up that uses your stuff so that must be made up then too .

You make up nonsense. Others can't. Their work is checked by others. No one takes you seriously because you don't want your work checked. Real scientists propose tests for their ideas before they even publish them. If they are wrong they welcome being shown to be wrong.

 

[james blunt]

You make up nonsense. Others can't. Their work is checked by others. No one takes you seriously because you don't want your work checked. Real scientists propose tests for their ideas before they even publish them. If they are wrong they welcome being shown to be wrong.

I've said before I was looking for funding to do tests , I can do the tests myself without giving all my ideas away .

In workable devices the test is in building the design to see if it works .

 

[Subduction Zone]

I've said before I was looking for funding to do tests , I can do the tests myself without giving all my ideas away .

In workable devices the test is in building the design to see if it works .

Usually one tests one's concepts first. A working device is the final step, not the first. So far all of your concepts fail. No construction necessary.

 

[james blunt]

Usually one tests one's concepts first. A working device is the final step, not the first. So far all of your concepts fail. No construction necessary.

Incorrect , my devices conceptually work because the Physics work . Some may be extreme and beyond worth while or budget , but some are definitely worth trying .

 

[Audie]

Usually one tests one's concepts first. A working device is the final step, not the first. So far all of your concepts fail. No construction necessary.

I am going to put both of you on ig till this thread goes away

 

[Subduction Zone]

I am going to put both of you on ig till this thread goes away

Awww.

I know. Some people simply can't be helped. I did seriously try to help him learn how to add and subtract negative numbers, but he would not even take instruction at that basic level.

 

[youknowme]

An "amateur scientist?" LOLOLOL. Studying science as a hobby is great, but calling yourself a "scientist" if you don't even have a science degree is just laughable.

So Charles Darwin was not a scientist?

 

[james blunt]

Awww.

I know. Some people simply can't be helped. I did seriously try to help him learn how to add and subtract negative numbers, but he would not even take instruction at that basic level.

I'm giving up , I've decided to think about me for once and try to sort my own life out .

 

[Rational Agnostic]

So Charles Darwin was not a scientist?

OK, so Darwin technically didn't have a science degree because no British school at the time offered specialized degrees in specific fields of science.. However, he took a five year voyage around the world intensely studying plants and animals. I highly doubt the OP who calls himself an amateur scientist has the dedication, passion, and ability that Darwin had.

 

[james blunt]

OK, so Darwin technically didn't have a science degree because no British school at the time offered specialized degrees in specific fields of science.. However, he took a five year voyage around the world intensely studying plants and animals. I highly doubt the OP who calls himself an amateur scientist has the dedication, passion, and ability that Darwin had.

I've been discussing science and learning it for years , that is dedication !

 

[youknowme]

OK, so Darwin technically didn't have a science degree because no British school at the time offered specialized degrees in specific fields of science.. However, he took a five year voyage around the world intensely studying plants and animals. I highly doubt the OP who calls himself an amateur scientist has the dedication, passion, and ability that Darwin had.

They taught the various theories on the variation of species in University back then as well as taxonomy, classes Darwin didn't take. However, I agree that Darwin worked tirelessly throughout his life to expand his knowledge and it is not likely the OP will ever put in that much effort. My point is though, that a degree does not make one a scientist, effort does.

Also, Darwin's studies extended far beyond his voyage.

 

[james blunt]

They taught the various theories on the variation of species in University back then as well as taxonomy, classes Darwin didn't take. However, I agree that Darwin worked tirelessly throughout his life to expand his knowledge and it is not likely the OP will ever put in that much effort. My point is though, that a degree does not make one a scientist, effort does.

Also, Darwin's studies extended far beyond his voyage.

I've just give the world a new ergonomically designed solar power design and you say I don't work tirelessly ?

I've spent enough time learning enough to be able to produce thoughts and design , about a decade to be precise and I've never given up although I have been up against it !

 

[youknowme]

I've just give the world a new ergonomically designed solar power design and you say I don't work tirelessly ?

View attachment 26498 View attachment 26499

I've spent enough time learning enough to be able to produce thoughts and design , about a decade to be precise and I've never given up although I have been up against it !

Do you know what the word ergonomically means? I mean is that suppose to be a hat I wear that beams solar power directly into my brain?

 

[youknowme]

I've been discussing science and learning it for years , that is dedication !

How's your algebra? Can you factor quadratics?

 

[james blunt]

Do you know what the word ergonomically means? I mean is that suppose to be a hat I wear that beams solar power directly into my brain?

Perfection to you !

It is a cone shaped array of solar panels with a solid core super conductor . The added core mass will invert space-time energy more efficiently than the lesser mass of just the solar panel . The cone shape allows for full coverage with a ~45 degree angled incline .
To save on materials there is no need for solar panels North facing , hence the cut out section facing North . Additionally for added efficiency , these could be placed on poles to gain height to make use of the suns angular rise and fall around the earths curvature .