Well, given that the CMBR is microwave and not visible light, yes. So? We can detect and make the images from those microwaves. They are NOT just 'artists impressions'.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Science and religion
- Thread starter james blunt
- Start date
Well, given that the CMBR is microwave and not visible light, yes. So? We can detect and make the images from those microwaves. They are NOT just 'artists impressions'.
OK, there is nothing more I can say. Dunning-Krueger effect is highly active here.james blunt
Well-Known Member
You can't make an image of the whole visible universe off a microwave detection , at best you get a data printout .
Supposing I suggested the detection is detecting micro bangs ?
On ongoing universal process !
james blunt
Well-Known Member
I have spent years asking science for proof , there isn't any real proof, it is speculative theory if I am honest .
Nope. Again, go learn the basics.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
I think you do not know as much about the ins and outs of science as you think you do . I have done a scientific research and investigation of science, over a decade period .
The only evidence of CBMR is the detection itself , the theory of CBMR is made up with no other fact other than the detection . There is presently no traceable source so to have a theory and automatic assume early cosmic energy remnants is presumptuous.
In reality the CMBR is still at the detection stage and as yet , not explained according to any actual facts .
That's the truth about CBMR sir like it or not .
james blunt
Well-Known Member
They could be detecting micro bang energy as I suggested and is equally valid . They could also be detecting space-time mass inversion pressure , where space-time is pushing down on the detection device . There could be other reasons also of course .
james blunt
Well-Known Member
Atomic mass curves space-time mass because N>n
The detector device will and does curve space-time energy towards itself , that is more likely what is being detected .
1) The cosmology model of the CMBR , the energy would ''crunch'' together if it were neutral charged or opposite charges , hence it would not be spread out
2) If the energy was mono pole , the energy would repulse itself and it would expand out of existence .
There is no way it ''hangs'' like ''clouds '' as the illustration on Wiki sort of suggests .
Now you know why science keeps banning me , because I destroy their delusions and mediocre minded theories .
The detector device will and does curve space-time energy towards itself , that is more likely what is being detected .
1) The cosmology model of the CMBR , the energy would ''crunch'' together if it were neutral charged or opposite charges , hence it would not be spread out
2) If the energy was mono pole , the energy would repulse itself and it would expand out of existence .
There is no way it ''hangs'' like ''clouds '' as the illustration on Wiki sort of suggests .
Now you know why science keeps banning me , because I destroy their delusions and mediocre minded theories .
Last edited:
nPeace
Veteran Member
@james blunt Um... So you know buddy. A lot of people know that these scientific myth can't be proven, and are merely guesswork and speculation and imaginary probabilities.
One only has to listen to the language of scientists, and it is clear that they only talk and act as if they know something, but they know nothing.
People have jobs to do. You do yours, and let them do theirs. The creator is doing his.
Stay cool buddy.
One only has to listen to the language of scientists, and it is clear that they only talk and act as if they know something, but they know nothing.
People have jobs to do. You do yours, and let them do theirs. The creator is doing his.
Stay cool buddy.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
@james blunt Um... So you know buddy. A lot of people know that these scientific myth can't be proven, and are merely guesswork and speculation and imaginary probabilities.
One only has to listen to the language of scientists, and it is clear that they only talk and act as if they know something, but they know nothing.
People have jobs to do. You do yours, and let them do theirs. The creator is doing his.
Stay cool buddy.
I don't have a job , nobody will give me a science job in an advisor role working from home . My theory of reality and N-field theory uses basic physical functions to derive a workable theory .
Science does have some great things and ideas but then there is some science that is just deluded and easy to show the incorrectness .
It really does bother me that people think space itself is expanding , ignoring definition completely .
It real bothers me that people are mediocre minded enough to think before the big bang there was nothing , 0 dimensions and no space .
This just is insane and I use to think I was mad .
james blunt
Well-Known Member
Experiment : Close your eyes tightly , then ''look'', you will 'see' an area of darkness , not nothing 0 dimensions .
p.s look does not mean open your eyes
Added - Indeed, for the last 30 years of Einstein’s life (even including the last moments just before his death on April 18, 1955), his scientific endeavors were committed to this vision as he focused on finding a unified field theory. Among other things, such a theory was to unify gravity (as described by Einstein’s very own general relativity)
I succeeded !
p.s look does not mean open your eyes
Added - Indeed, for the last 30 years of Einstein’s life (even including the last moments just before his death on April 18, 1955), his scientific endeavors were committed to this vision as he focused on finding a unified field theory. Among other things, such a theory was to unify gravity (as described by Einstein’s very own general relativity)
I succeeded !
Last edited:
james blunt
Well-Known Member
I've gone deaf , well , the threads gone quiet so I guess they give up .............
james blunt
Well-Known Member
God held out his left hand and said ''let there be light'' , a monopole manifested and then dispersed . God then held out his right hand and said , ''let there be light'' , an opposite charged monopole , manifested and then dispersed .
God then put his hands together in prayer and said , ''let there be light'' , two opposite charged monopoles manifested simultaneous to become the first binary particle and birth of a BH , E=mc³
God then put his hands together in prayer and said , ''let there be light'' , two opposite charged monopoles manifested simultaneous to become the first binary particle and birth of a BH , E=mc³
You could put it that way.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
It's the normal , people don't like being incorrect !
They also don't like arguing with people who are consistently wrong and won't learn.
And, I might point out, ignorant of the basics and refusing to learn those also.
Last edited:
james blunt
Well-Known Member
That is not true and you know it ! To the contrary they persistently try to get me to accept their false versions trying to gain neurological control by neurological attacking me in this manner . Their failures is that my mind is free and will not be subjective to the falsities .
They can call me what they like but the truth is it still won't make them correct , yourself included ! You're persistence in your stereotypical behavior , joining the ''mob'' !
No free thinking !
You say I won't learn yet I know present physics more or less inside and out so obviously I have already learned . I point out errors in the information I am learning but ''you'' seem to think errors are irrelevant .
At some point people just ignore nonsense. Especially when that nonsense is clear and obvious to anyone who has studied the subject.
Have a good day!
Have a good day!
james blunt
Well-Known Member
A ''copout'' reply .
I have studied science for over a decade , I know the ins and outs , I can explain the universe as the present models states . However ! They are still incorrect so I'd rather explain the truth and not lie about the incorrectness .
I wish you good day , I know when the ''deck is rigged'' to keep people like me quiet !
And I have studied physics for more than 4 decades. Your 'explanations' are nothing but the trivial x+(-x)=0 or complete nonsesne.